GRADING RUBRIC YOUR GRADE WILL BE DETERMINED BASED ON

14 DELAYED COKING FROM BOTTOMS UPGRADING TO POWER PLANT
41206 LINEAR GRADING THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ARE REVISED AS
4TH & 5TH GRADE SPECIAL AREA GRADING POLICY IN

7 SMALL GROUP GRADING SHEET GRADERCOURSE NOTE GRADE EVERYONE
APPENDIX 4 TOXICITY SCALE (CTCNCIC CRITERIA) RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GRADING
APPENDIX 5 MUSCLE STRENGTH GRADING SCALE THE OXFORD SCALE

Grading Rubric


Your grade will be determined based on whether you paper meets the criteria stated below for a specific letter grade.


All papers that are not well-organized and contain grammatical and spelling errors will suffer a ½ letter grade deduction.



An “A Paper”:

--successfully explains all of the concepts relevant to the assignment

--provides an excellent summary of Foucault’s thought in the context of the assignment question

--displays an excellent grasp of the nature of the philosophical problem at hand

--when needed, provides illuminating examples in order to clarify difficult philosophical ideas

--has a main thesis that it defends well by means of providing sound arguments and evidence. It does not simply report Foucault’s arguments, but does so with the intention of connecting it to wider issues or to a particular idea to be defended throughout the paper

--provides an honest, informed, charitable, and philosophically compelling critical evaluation of Foucault’s arguments

--is well-written, well-organized, and free from grammatical and spelling errors

--shows engagement and genuine interest in the topic at hand



A “B Paper”:

--successfully explains most of the concepts relevant to the assignment

--provides a very good summary of Foucault’s thought in the context of the assignment question

--displays a good grasp of the nature of the philosophical problem at hand

--when needed, provides illuminating examples in order to clarify difficult philosophical ideas

--has a main thesis that it attempts to defend by means of providing sound arguments and evidence. It does not simply report Foucault’s arguments, but does so with the intention of connecting it to wider issues or to a particular idea to be defended throughout the paper

--attempts to provide an honest, informed, charitable, and philosophically compelling critical evaluation of Foucault’s arguments

--is well-written, well-organized, and free from grammatical and spelling errors

--shows engagement and genuine interest in the topic at hand



A “C Paper”:

--fails to explain all of the main concepts relevant to the assignment sufficiently well

--provides a partial summary of Foucault’s thought in the context of the assignment question

--displays a limited grasp of the nature of the philosophical problem at hand

--fails to provide good examples to clarify difficult philosophical ideas

--fails to defend its thesis sufficiently or does not take a clear stance in evaluating the arguments and thoughts in the reading.

--fails to provide a well thought-out critical evaluation of Foucault’s arguments

--is not well-organized and/or contains grammatical and spelling errors

--raises doubts about its author’s engagement and interest in the topic at hand



A “D Paper”:

--does a poor job of explaining the main concepts

--fails to provide an accurate summary of Foucault’s thought in the context of the assignment question

--displays a very limited grasp of the nature of the philosophical problem at hand

--fails to provide good examples to clarify difficult philosophical ideas

--does not have a viable thesis or fails to defend its thesis or does not take a clear stance in evaluating the arguments and thoughts in the reading.

--fails to provide a well thought-out critical evaluation of Foucault’s arguments

--is not well-organized and/or contains too many grammatical and spelling errors

--shows no sign of engagement with and no interest in the topic at hand



An “F Paper”:

--shows no understanding of the main concepts

--does not provide a viable summary of Foucault’s thought in the context of the assignment question

--displays no grasp of the nature of the philosophical problem at hand

--does not provide examples to clarify difficult philosophical ideas

--does not have a viable thesis or fails to defend its thesis sufficiently or does not take a clear stance in evaluating the arguments and thoughts in the reading.

--does not to provide a well thought-out critical evaluation of Foucault’s arguments

--is not well-organized and/or contains too many grammatical and spelling errors

--shows no sign of engagement with and no interest in the topic at hand



ASSESSING AND GRADING STUDENT WRITING CAROLYN HAYNES DIRECTOR OF
BASIC DEPARTMENTAL GRADING RUBRIC FOR WRITTEN ASSIGNMENTS FACULTY MAY
BOOK REVIEW PODCAST GRADING RUBRIC CRITERIA SCRIPT GREAT GOOD


Tags: based on, determined, grade, grading, rubric, based