BALTIC JOURNAL OF CAREER EDUCATION AND MANAGEMENT WEB SITE

BALTIC JOURNAL OF CAREER EDUCATION AND MANAGEMENT

Web site: http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/bjcem

TITLE OF ARTICLE:

ID:

1.

Is the article original, and does it contribute something new to the field? (Importance of article / Relevance and Appeal to national / international scholarly community)

Excellent

Good

Moderate

Poor

2.

Do the title and abstract together give an adequate summary of the article / paper?

Excellent

Good

Moderate

Poor

3.

Statement of problem (s) / aim (s) / objective (s)

Excellent

Good

Moderate

Poor

4.

Theoretical basis / Theoretical framework / Literature review / Clarification of concepts

Excellent

Good

Moderate

Poor

5.

Appropriateness of the research plan and design (if applicable) /Appropriateness of data-collection and procedure /Data analysis /Trustworthiness/ reliability and validity

Excellent

Good

Moderate

Poor

6.

Steps taken to ensure that the research complies with standard ethical guidelines (if applicable)

Excellent

Good

Moderate

Poor

7.

Data presentation / Discussion (Are the results clearly and correctly presented? Are they consistent with the methodology?)

Excellent

Good

Moderate

Poor

8.

To what extent is the line of argumentation in the article clear, cohesive and logical? standards?

Excellent

Good

Moderate

Poor

9.

Does the paper satisfy accepted criteria for academic writing in terms of coherence, grammar, layout and organisation?

Excellent

Good

Moderate

Poor

10.

Do the references adhere to APA?

Excellent

Good

Moderate

Poor

11.

Is the language fluent and precise?

Excellent

Good

Moderate

Poor

12.

Conclusions /Implications and/or recommendations are relevant and useful.

Excellent

Good

Moderate

Poor

13.

Is article significantly international in nature to be of value to global audience? /underline/

(Of Local Interest Only) (Of Regional Interest)  (Of International Interest)

Excellent

Good

Moderate

Poor

14.

Overall assessment of content

Excellent

Good

Moderate

Poor

15.

Does the paper address relevant scientific questions within the scope of BJCEM?

Excellent

Good

Moderate

Poor

16. Please write a brief narrative report on the article in which you provide a general or overall assessment of the manuscript and its
suitability for publication.

17. Please indicate the strong aspects of the research that is reported.

18. Please indicate the weak aspects of the research reported.

19. Final recommendation:

Accept without revision

Accept with minor revisions

Accept: with moderate revisions

Pre-accept: major revisions and re-evaluation

Reject: Rework and re-submit

Reject: do NOT re-submit

20. Comments: Please indicate in the space below any comments and suggestions for improving the article.