EVALUATION CRITERIA CRITERIA THE [NAME SCIENTIFIC EVALUATION COMMITTEE] WILL

  INTERNATIONAL PILOT STUDY ON THE EVALUATION OF
BLACK HISTORY MONTH 2007 EVALUATION FORM PLEASE
CONTRACT TEACHING FACULTY SELF EVALUATION GUIDELINES 1 SUBJECT

TERMS OF REFERENCE EXTERNAL EVALUATION FOR ACTION
VOLUNTEER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION 3 MONTH CHECKPOINT
(INCLUDE THIS FORM IN EVALUATION) DATE TO ALL COMMITTEE

 Quality and impact :

Evaluation criteria



Criteria

The [name scientific evaluation committee] will apply the criteria below to assess the quality of proposals. The [name scientific evaluation committee] will consist of international experts who will be assigned to proposals lying within their area of expertise and asked to provide a peer review of the scientific aspects.


The SEC will apply the criteria below to assess the quality of proposals:


  1. Scientific Aspects

Scientific quality should be leading and undisputed and will be assessed by means of the following criteria:

    1. Scientific quality of the proposed research

    2. Policy relevance and relevance to the call

    3. Novelty, originality and innovation

    4. Clarity of the hypothesis, theories and/or research questions

    5. Quality of applicants and suitability of the consortium

    6. Level of transdisciplinarity

Scientific quality is considered above all other criteria and a high quality is a prerequisite for funding.


  1. Project management and added value:


The following criteria will also be used to evaluate and rank the proposals:

    1. Feasibility and risk

    2. Level of integration and collaboration

    3. European added value

    4. Quality of project governance

    5. Suitability of budget requirements

    6. Networking and dissemination activities

    7. Training opportunities


European added value is the value resulting from the European research project, which is additional to the value that would have resulted from research projects funded at national level. The added value may vary, depending on the type of project, and there can be various answers to this question.


These may include: relevance to EU policy statements, legislative framework or management plans; added value to national research projects across Europe by linking expertise and efforts across national teams; bringing about comparisons at the local level between researchers who are not used to work together; standardization of methods, general increase of common knowledge in biodiversity relative to the three themes of the call, etc.



No additional criteria will be used.


Score

The criteria and proposals are scored according to the following scale:



5 Excellent


4 Very good


3 Good


2 Fair


1 Poor


0 The proposal fails to address the issue under examination or cannot be judged against the criteria due to missing or incomplete information



Page 2 of 2



0 ISLAMIC DEVELOPMENT BANK EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE SELECTION
16 EVALUATION OF HEALTH EDUCATION PROGRAMMES STUDY SESSION 16
18032022 EVALUATION DU COURS EVALUATION DU COURS D’ENSEIGNEMENT SUPÉRIEUR


Tags: criteria criteria, the criteria, criteria, evaluation, [name, scientific, committee]