EVALUATION OF LONG TERM EXCHANGE TO BE COMPLETED BY

  INTERNATIONAL PILOT STUDY ON THE EVALUATION OF
BLACK HISTORY MONTH 2007 EVALUATION FORM PLEASE
CONTRACT TEACHING FACULTY SELF EVALUATION GUIDELINES 1 SUBJECT

TERMS OF REFERENCE EXTERNAL EVALUATION FOR ACTION
VOLUNTEER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION 3 MONTH CHECKPOINT
(INCLUDE THIS FORM IN EVALUATION) DATE TO ALL COMMITTEE


EVALUATION OF LONG TERM EXCHANGE TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PARTICIPANT


Please return this document duly completed to the EJTN ([email protected]) within one month

after the end of the exchange



I- DETAILS OF THE PARTICIPANT AND THE EXCHANGE


Surname:      


First name(s):      


Nationality:      


Functions:      


Length of service:      


Host institution:      


Department/Member you were assigned to:      


Dates of the exchange:      


Length of the exchange:      


Name of the referent(s) in the host institution:      



II- THE ORGANISATION OF THE EXCHANGE


  1. The support of the host institution for your integration at the beginning of the exchange:


Very satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory


  1. The information and assistance received concerning practical aspects of your exchange (accommodation, administrative procedure which may be undertaken):


Very satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory


If you have answered unsatisfactory, to one or several of the question(s) above, please explain:

     

     

     

     


III- THE EXCHANGE


  1. General aspects:


How would you rate the following aspects of the exchange?



Satisfactory Unsatisfactory


Too short Too long



Very satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory




Very satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory


If you have answered unsatisfactory, to one or several of the question(s) above, please explain:

     

 

     

     




  1. Content of the exchange




  1. Did you draft opinions, conclusions, reports which are part of the proceedings of the host institution?



Yes No



  1. Did you write research papers on specific legal topics?



Yes No



  1. Did you participate in hearings alongside judges?


Yes No Not applicable



  1. Were you present at the court’s deliberations?


Yes No Not applicable



  1. Did you participate in meetings:





Yes No





Yes No





Yes No



  1. Did you participate in other activities of the host jurisdiction?


Yes No


If yes, which ones,

          


  1. Which aspects above do you think are the most important?

          



  1. In your opinion, what other activities could enrich the content of the exchange?

          




  1. Was your access to the host institution legal facilities (library, database...):



Very satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory



If unsatisfactory, explain?

     

     

     



  1. Did you take part in seminars, conferences... organised by the host institution:



Yes No





  1. Language



Your mother tongue English French Other language:      



Yes No


Yes No


If No, do you think it would be useful?


Yes No



Yes No


If Yes, was the course offered by the host institution or did you take it on your own initiative?


Course offered by the host institution Course taken personally


Observations :

     


     



IV- THE BENEFITS OF THE EXCHANGE


How would you rate?


  1. Your improved knowledge of the functioning of the host institution:


Very satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory


  1. Your improved knowledge of the legal proceedings or/and instruments used in the host institution:


Very satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory


  1. Your improved knowledge of the relations between national judicial authorities and the host institution:


Very satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory


  1. Your improved linguistic knowledge


Very satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory


If you answered unsatisfactory to one or several of the question(s) above, please explain.

     


     


     


     




V- THE FOLLOW-UP AND GENERAL ASSESMENT OF THE EXCHANGE


  1. Do you intend to give conference, seminars to the judicial authorities of your home country to share your experience with your colleagues?


Yes No


  1. What is your overall assessment of the programme in which you participated?


Very satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory


  1. In your view, should long term exchanges in your hosting institution as proposed by the Exchange Programme be continued in future years?


Yes No




EVALUATION OF LONG TERM EXCHANGE TO BE COMPLETED BY

With the support of the European Union


0 ISLAMIC DEVELOPMENT BANK EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE SELECTION
16 EVALUATION OF HEALTH EDUCATION PROGRAMMES STUDY SESSION 16
18032022 EVALUATION DU COURS EVALUATION DU COURS D’ENSEIGNEMENT SUPÉRIEUR


Tags: completed by, duly completed, exchange, completed, evaluation