PROPOSITIONS AND COMMENTS WRITTEN BY TRAINEES ALL REMARKS ARE

ANCIENT GREEK PHALANX COMBAT IDENTIFY FACTS LISTS CONCEPTS RULESPROPOSITIONS
ANNEXE 3 TABLEAU RECAPITULATIF DES PROPOSITIONS AU TITRE DE
ANNEXE B MODÈLE D’APPEL À PROPOSITIONS (AP) POUR LES

APPEL À PROPOSITIONS AGIRPFWAAF001 LAMBASSADE DES ÉTATSUNIS D’AMÉRIQUE EN
APPENDIX BASIC PROPOSITIONS ABOUT SUFFICIENT AND NECESSARY CONDITIONS TO
CADMIN2019 NOTE DE SYNTHÈSE ET DE PROPOSITIONS À PARTIR

PROPOSITIONS AND COMMENTS, written by trainees

Propositions AND COMMENTS, written by trainees.

All remarks are sent to training companies.

Addressed to Kharkiv technologies centre (trainer - Gusev Volodymir)

The knowledge missed (They need to be discussed and enlightened during next module):

To give specific example of the technology marketing
The knowledge for searching technology buyers was not provided (2 trainees noted). To give the concrete examples of successful searching investors and buyers of technologies. To study more detailed the influence of the law on the innovation process.
To pay more attention to the practical use of the legislative documents.
The question of innovative infrastructure is not enlightened good enough: its current state, who can improve it, what factors have an influence on it.

Remarks to follow for next module:

Not enough attention paid at present situation in Ukraine. There would be nice if the ratio of information what is working in the western countries and what we need to do in Ukraine would be at least 60/40.
The level of the audience needs to be taken into consideration. Not to make the big excursion into the history of question.
The course is bad structured and has too much theoretical information and too little of the practical one. The lecturer doesn’t have practical experience and is not the best specialist in theory as well.
The slides were prepared not professionally – they were rather assistance to the lector, that to the trainees (too much text, bullets only).
There were often the discussions about situation in the institutes instead of the lecture. Such discussions are interesting, but more appropriate to coffee-breaks.
To make distinct correspondence of topics of the program and headings in presentations. According to handouts some topics were not broached at all (1.2.3 Project risks management, 1.3.3. Presentation technologies. Negotiation skills 1.2.4. Commercial potential estimation).

Addressed to Institute of Intellectual Property and Law (trainer - Tsibuliov Pavlo)

To make technological audit on the example, which is well prepared. To explain specific details of filling of the audit documentation and calculations (how to make the budgeting etc).
To explain calculation of the cost of the technology advancement.
To explain economical information more comprehensible – 2 persons.
To give more time for preparation of own propositions of technology.
The level of lecturer is high – the slides are informative and the examples are bright, the course is structured and the material corresponds to the program previewed.

To both training companies

To give all the handouts in advance.

To STCU

The audit in the institute was not well organized. The audience was not ready.

To invite the real specialists (with practical experience) on all the questions of the program instead of the “universal” and theoretical one from Kharviv technology.

To add the banquet.

CE DOCUMENT DE TRAVAIL RECENSE LES PROPOSITIONS DU CHSP
CFS20086 PROPOSITIONS DE RENFORCEMENT DU COMITÉ DE LA
COMMERCIAL PROPOSITIONS DATABASE OF ZAPORIZHZHYA REGION 2012 № THE

Tags: trainees, propositions, comments, written, remarks