DIVYA APPASAMY MEGANA SEKAR VIJAY SRIVASTAVA HELEN ZHANG CHAPTER

DIVYA APPASAMY MEGANA SEKAR VIJAY SRIVASTAVA HELEN ZHANG CHAPTER






Chapter 4: THE EMPIRE IN TRANSITION

Divya Appasamy, Megana Sekar, Vijay Srivastava, Helen Zhang

Chapter 4: The Empire in Transition


Q #1DQ #1: To what extent were the major actions taken by the British against the colonists from 1763 to 1770 justified?

I. English Monopoly was Forced on Colonists.


A. Sugar Act of 1764

  1. Damaged colonial commerce and sugar trade

  2. Forced mercantilism » Less trade opportunities/w other countries » Smaller market » Less profit for colonists


B. British Customs Commission Established in Boston

  1. Lucrative smuggling trade in Boston(Commission Headquarters) is diminished » poverty in Boston and discontent merchants » forced onto colonists trade regulations that only benefitted the British

  2. Commission didn’t succeed much in anything but overbearingly enforcing unconstitutional laws » reminder of British control and oppression


II. Asserted Legitimacy of English Colonies.


A. Stamp Act of 1765

  1. Stamps on all documents » Prevented forgery/ illegitimate copies » Protected documents while giving colonial documents more credit

  2. Taxed all colonists » Brought in more revenue » Boosted economy and made English a more impressive empire


B. Mutiny Act of 1965

  1. Necessary to protect borders from Indians and enforce British supremacy

  2. Reduced housing costs for English » Better collective economy


III. Rowdy Colonists Needed to be Controlled


  1. Sons of Liberty

  1. Reckless, violent action was taken against British when more peaceful alternatives were available » Colonies need to be leashed since they cannot handle themselves » English actions to reform government are thereby justified

  2. Sons of Liberty swept up normal citizens in their affairs » proved to English that the colonies could easily gang up against them for trivial matters, so the colonies needed restraint


  1. Boston Massacre - 1770

  1. Close-to-terrorism behavior from colonists in retaliation to a nonexistent threat from British » Demonstrates colonist incompetence with maintaining order themselves » Justifies British taking control of colonial affairs


CONCLUSION: The British began enforcing a series of laws on the colonists after the French and Indian War from 1763-1770. As a result, England’s forced monopoly compromised colonial profit. However, other British efforts affirmed their legitimacy as an English colony. Additionally, England’s new procedures kept the colonies in line, which was necessary since the colonies have proven to be dangerous on their own. Although their mercantile pursuits jeopardized the colonial market, by affirming America’s influence as an English colony, and through witnessing unscrupulous colonists at work, Britain’s actions against the colonists were justified.






Tags: vijay, zhang, srivastava, divya, megana, helen, chapter, appasamy, sekar