e-Tag 1.8.2 Specification Wish List
Removal of formal term Transaction Information System (TIS) This term is only used in the introduction, section 1.1.1 and in the glossary. It is not found in any other “interchange” related document. This item has been addressed
Revise EIR definition and eliminate/replace any TSIN references. This item has been addressed.
Revise Electronic Tagging (e-Tag) definition. This item has been addressed. ACTION ITEM: Review WEQ-000.
Revise 6.1.1. Transaction Types to include Recallable and to economize descriptions. This item was addressed.
Revise 6.1.4 rewording of ramp duration validations. This has been addressed.
Stacked transmission reservations do not have to be same TSP or same PSE. The stack reservations do require the same TSP but do not require the same PSE.
Revise references to 6.2.x since there is no section 6.2. This item has been addressed.
Review 3.4 for correctness. To be completed at a later date.
Consider references to profile types Dynamic min and max energy – do they exist? Are they needed? Schema does not support dynamic min and max energy. Sections were removed and conforming changes were made to other sections.
NITS on OASIS needs to add new elements to schema to be paired with the contract field in the transmission allocation element (could be called contract_detail_type and contract_detail_value) where Resources or DNRs are a type (enumerated from registry) are specified. Allow stacking of resources. Consider adding MISC INFO to allocation, also. ACTION ITEM: Larry Stone to draft white paper for JESS to comment on
Consider adding MISC INFO to allocation, also.
Suggestion as to whether or not new contract_detail items also apply to Market path segments. No action taken. Not needed. The market segment already includes a MISC INFO list.
Suggestion to include a MISC INFO in the reliability limit profile. Not clear what need this addresses. The profile change request already includes a MISC INFO list.
In Appendix A, add language as to how this stuff got here and how it is changed. Change where possible. ACTION ITEM: Bob Harshbarger to develop language.
Sections 1.4.6, 2.6.1.3, 3.6.1.3, 4.6.1.2, change the term “cleared” to “ignored” or “not enforced.” Where applicable, changes were made.
Allow BAs to make ATF adjustments to pseudo-ties (make all aspects of pseudo-tie type same as Dynamic type). This has been addressed.
Modify test tag functionality to utilize aspects of the new EIR. It was agreed to not make this modification at this time.
Consider expanding allowable duration of an ATF tag (WECC request for longer submittals). Consider the need for WEQ-004 to be the guiding document on this and the spec just following the BPs. This will be handled in WEQ-004 modifications. The specs will reference the business practice standards. Creation of a table for the spec outlining the timing requirements for ATF tags will be included in Appendix B and will eventually be incorporated in WEQ-004. This appendix was created in the functional specs.
Review and consider language regarding ramp overlaps – could be resolved by minimum request duration = ½ startrampduration + ½ stoprampduration. This has been addressed. ACTION ITEM: TJ to draft a picture for section 6.1.4.
Review New e-Tag Request definition for consistency with Electronic Tag definition. This has been addressed.
Lower case the terms physical segment and market segment. This is a non-substantive change to be done at a later date.
Review all terms to determine if they are consistently capitalized. This is a non-substantive change to be done at a later date.
Review for references to Interchange or RFI
MODULE SPECIFICATION IMPORTANT NOTES – PLEASE READ
PERSON SPECIFICATION CLASS TEACHER ESSENTIAL DESIRABLE
PERSON SPECIFICATION CLASS TEACHER 2018 ESSENTIAL DESIRABLE
Tags: formal term, formal, specification, removal