QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN CHECKLIST GUIDELINES FOR THE QUALITY ASSURANCE

(REVISED) CELE ORGANISING FRAMEWORK ON EVALUATING QUALITY IN EDUCATIONAL
ANNUAL DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT FOR 2018 WESTFIELD
EQUALITY MONITORING FORM WHY WE NEED THIS

QUALITY AND CHARACTER ORIENTED SCHOOL PEMERINTAH PROVINSI
SHARING OUR THOUGHTS ON QUALITY EDUCATION
(DRAFT 2704) PRESCHOOL EDUCATION THE QUALITY OF EDUCATIONAL PROVISION

Quality Assurance Plan Checklist

quality assurance plan checkLIST



GUIDELINES FOR THE QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN CHECKLIST:


This checklist is provided as part of the evaluation process for the Quality Assurance Plan. The checklist assists designated reviewers in determining whether specifications meet criteria established in HUD’s System Development Methodology (SDM). The objective of the evaluation is to determine whether the document complies with HUD development methodology requirements.


Attached to this document is the DOCUMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST. Its purpose is to assure that documents achieve the highest standards relative to format, consistency, completeness, quality, and presentation.


Submissions must include the following three documents, and must be presented in the following order: (First) Document Review Checklist, (Second) the Quality Assurance Plan Checklist, and (Third) the Quality Assurance Plan.


Document authors are required to complete the two columns indicated as “AUTHOR X-REFERENCE Page #/Section #” and “AUTHOR COMMENTS” before the submission. Do NOT complete the last two columns marked as “COMPLY” and “REVIEWER COMMENTS” since these are for the designated reviewers.


Document reviewers will consult the HUD SDM and SDM templates when reviewing the documents and completing the reviewer’s portions of this checklist.


AUTHOR REFERENCE (Project Identifier):



Designated Reviewers:

Start Date:

Completed Date:

Area Reviewed:

Comments:

1:






2:






3:






4:






Summary Reviewer:






The Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) presents a framework for activities, which when followed, will ensure delivery of quality products and services. The SDM provides the project standards and procedures to be used as the basis for the QA group’s reviews and audits.


TABLE OF CONTENTS


1.0 General Information

1.1 Purpose

1.2 Scope

1.3 System Overview

1.4 Project References

1.5 Acronyms and Abbreviations

1.6 Points of Contact

1.6.1 Information

1.6.2 Coordination

2.0 Schedule of Tasks and Responsibilities

3.0 System Documentation

3.1 Documents by Phase

3.1.1 Initiate Phase

3.1.2 Define Phase

3.1.3 Design Phase

3.1.4 Build Phase

3.1.5 Evaluate Phase

3.1.6 Operate Phase

3.2 Discipline for Documentation Standard Practices













4.0 Reviews and Audits

4.1 Review Process

4.2 Formal Reviews and Audits

4.2.1 Lifecycle Reviews

4.2.2 Audits

4.3 Informal Reviews

4.4 Review Reports

4.5 Review and Audit Metrics

5.0 Testing

6.0 Problem Reporting and Corrective Action

6.1 Problem/Issue Documentation

6.2 Report Metrics

7.0 Tools

8.0 Project Controls

8.1 Product Control

8.2 Supplier Control

9.0 Training




To be completed by Author

To be completed by Reviewer

REQUIREMENT

AUTHOR X‑REFERENCE Page #/Section #

AUTHOR COMMENTS

COMPLY

REVIEWER COMMENTS




Y

N


1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1

Purpose: Describe the purpose of the Quality Assurance Plan.






1.2

Scope: Describe the scope of the Quality Assurance Plan as it relates to the project.






1.3

System Overview: Provide a brief system overview description as a point of reference for the remainder of the document, including responsible organization, system name or title, system code, system category, operational status, and system environment and special conditions.






1.4

Project References: Provide a list of the references that were used in preparation of this document.






1.5

Acronyms and Abbreviations: Provide a list of the acronyms and abbreviations used in this document and the meaning of each.






1.6

Points of Contact:







1.6.1 Information: Provide a list of the points of organizational contact (POCs) that may be needed by the document user for informational and troubleshooting purposes.







1.6.2 Coordination: Provide a list of organizations that require coordination between the project and its specific support function (e.g., installation coordination, security, etc.). Include a schedule for coordination activities.









To be completed by Author

To be completed by Reviewer

REQUIREMENT

AUTHOR X‑REFERENCE Page #/Section #

AUTHOR COMMENTS

COMPLY

REVIEWER COMMENTS




Y

N


2.0 SCHEDULE OF TASKS AND RESPONSIBILITIES


Based on the tasks described in your Project Plan, provide a schedule of the QA activities for the duration of the project. Tasks may include, but are not limited to, those listed below:


  1. Identify Standards and Guidelines

  2. Evaluate Software Tools

  3. Evaluate Facilities

  4. Evaluate Software Products Review Process

  5. Evaluate Project Planning, Tracking, and Oversight Processes

  6. Evaluate Requirements Analysis Process

  7. Evaluate Design Process

  8. Evaluate Code and Unit Testing Process

  9. Evaluate Integration Testing Process

  10. Evaluate Acceptance Testing Process

  11. Evaluate Release Process

  12. Evaluate the Corrective Action Process

  13. Evaluate Media Certification Process

  14. Certify Non-deliverable Software

  15. Evaluate Storage and Handling Process

  16. Evaluate Deviations and Waivers Process

  17. Evaluate Configuration Management Process

  18. Evaluate Software Development Library Control Process

  19. Evaluate Non-developmental Software

  20. Perform Configuration Audits

  21. Evaluate Risk Management Process









To be completed by Author

To be completed by Reviewer

REQUIREMENT

AUTHOR X‑REFERENCE Page #/Section #

AUTHOR COMMENTS

COMPLY

REVIEWER COMMENTS




Y

N


3.0 SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION

3.1

Documents by Phase: List and briefly describe the documentation expected to be produced during this project. Depending on the size of your project, this may include, but is not limited to, the documents in the following subsections:







3.1.1 Initiate Phase:

  1. Needs Statement

  2. Project Plan (including WBS)

  3. Configuration Management Plan

  4. Quality Assurance Plan

  5. Feasibility Study

  6. Cost/Benefit Analysis

  7. Risk Analysis






3.1.2 Define Phase:

  • System Support and Acquisition Plan (initial)

  • Functional Requirements Document

  • Data Requirements Document

  • System Security and Privacy Plan

  • Internal Audit Plan

  • Project Plan (updated)






3.1.3 Design Phase:

  1. System/Subsystem Specifications

  2. Database Specifications

  3. Program Specifications

  4. System Support and Acquisition Plan (final)

  5. Validation, Verification, and Testing Plan (initial)

  6. Training Plan (initial)

  7. Project Plan (updated)









To be completed by Author

To be completed by Reviewer

REQUIREMENT

AUTHOR X‑REFERENCE Page #/Section #

AUTHOR COMMENTS

COMPLY

REVIEWER COMMENTS




Y

N



3.1.4 Build Phase:

  1. Installation and Conversion Plan (initial)

  2. Test Plan

  3. User’s Manual

  4. Operations Manual

  5. Maintenance Manual

  6. Validation, Verification, and Testing Plan (final)

  7. Training Plan (final)

  8. Project Plan (updated)







3.1.5 Evaluate Phase:

  1. Test Results and Evaluation Reports

  2. Installation and Conversion Plan (final)

  3. Project Plan (updated)







3.1.6 Operate Phase:

  1. Pilot Test Results

  2. Training Material

  3. Project Plan (updated)





3.2

Discipline for Documentation Standard Practices: Describe the criteria that will be applied during review and evaluation of all lifecycle documents.








To be completed by Author

To be completed by Reviewer

REQUIREMENT

AUTHOR X‑REFERENCE Page #/Section #

AUTHOR COMMENTS

COMPLY

REVIEWER COMMENTS




Y

N


4.0 REVIEWS AND AUDITS

4.1

Review Process: Define the steps of the review process and the procedures that will be used to conduct reviews.





4.2

Formal Reviews and Audits:






4.2.1 Lifecycle Reviews: Identify the types of SDM associated lifecycle or non-lifecycle reviews that will be conducted within each project lifecycle phase. Include a schedule of reviews and include how the results of each review will be used on the project.


Typically, the lifecycle reviews include:

  1. Requirements Review

  2. Design Review

  3. Specification Review

  4. Preliminary Design Review

  5. Critical Design Review

  6. Test Readiness Review

  7. Formal Qualification Review

  8. Production Readiness Review

  9. Acceptance Test Review

  10. Post-Implementation Review






4.2.2 Audits: Describe the audits that will be conducted on the project and when they will be scheduled.





4.3

Informal Reviews: Outline the types of informal reviews that will be conducted.





4.4

Review Reports: Identify QA reports that will be produced throughout the project lifecycle and their uses.





4.5

Review and Audit Metrics: Describe the metrics that will be used to capture management information, and how they will be analyzed and reported.








To be completed by Author

To be completed by Reviewer

REQUIREMENT

AUTHOR X‑REFERENCE Page #/Section #

AUTHOR COMMENTS

COMPLY

REVIEWER COMMENTS




Y

N


5.0 TESTING

Identify the roles and responsibilities of the QA function in relation to testing throughout the various stages of the project.





6.0 PROBLEM REPORTING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION

Discuss QA responsibilities and activities concerned with the reporting and tracking of project-related problems and resolutions.





6.1

Problem/Issue Documentation: Explain how problems and issues will be documented.





6.2

Report Metrics: Describe how metrics from the above reports will be collected and analyzed to determine and coordinate corrective actions.





7.0 TOOLS


Describe the tools that will be used for QA and the methodology employed to implement usage of the mentioned tools.





8.0 PROJECT CONTROLS

8.1

Product Control: Identify how QA will monitor the methods and tools used to maintain and store controlled versions of system products.





8.2

Supplier Control: Describe the provisions for assuring that products provided by suppliers meet established requirements.





9.0 TRAINING


Identify the training activities that will be provided to meet the needs of QA on this project.






12 April 2002 Peer Review Page i



(INE)QUALITY STREET DO YOU OR DOES YOUR PARENT(S)
05 PROMOTING INCLUSION EQUALITY AND VALUING DIVERSITY POLICY ALONGSIDE
1 QUALITY ASSESSMENT FIGURE S1 RISK OF BIAS ASSESSMENT


Tags: assurance plan, quality assurance, quality, assurance, checklist, guidelines