MAKING A PERIODIC TEACHER ASSESSMENT JUDGEMENT FOR READING USING

0 WARNING THE MAKING OF A FALSE
1 “MAKING CITIES RESILIENT” WORLD DISASTER REDUCTION CAMPAIGN 201011
1 RUNNING HEAD MAKING SENSE OF NONSENSE WORD FLUENCY

11 MAKING POPULATION PYRAMIDS FOR DISTRICTS (AND WINNIPEG CASNCS)
13 DECEMBER 2016 THE RIGHTS OF COMMUNICATION AND MAKING
1848 WIS JI‑CRIMINAL 1848 1848 UNEMPLOYEMENT INSURANCE FRAUD MAKING

Making a periodic teacher assessment judgement for reading using APP

Making a periodic teacher assessment judgement for reading using APP

Review the evidence

Consider whether the evidence:

demonstrates a range of reading experiences, for example:
- shared, guided and independent reading
- book-talk, reading journal responses, drama and role play
- cross-curricular opportunities
includes responses to a range of:
- text types, e.g. narrative, non-fiction and poetry
- text formats, e.g. magazines, film clips, multimodal texts
demonstrates independence and choice

Choose a level boundary and select the relevant assessment guidelines to use

Review the evidence and complete an assessment guidelines grid

Making AF judgements

Review evidence marking bullet points/statements with instances of evidence. You may choose to do this on a day to day basis.
Decide which bullet points/statements to highlight. Is there enough evidence to highlight a statement?
Consider the highlighted bullet points/statements and decide which level has been achieved in each AF. Tick the appropriate level related box.

Making an overall level judgement

Use the making a level judgement diagram overleaf.

Checking the overall level judgement

Compare judgements to standards files at the same level to confirm judgements are in line with national standards.

Use APP assessments to inform planning and teaching

Use the assessment guidelines to identify gaps in learning.
Plan next steps in learning from PNS learning objectives.

APP level judgements: READING

LOW: Meets the minimum requirements for the level
LOW 1	AF1 	AF2 	AF3  Some highlighting			BL (below level) ticked in more than ONE AF Check Level below
LOW 2	AF1 	AF2 	AF3  Some highlighting
LOW 3		AF2 	AF3 	Plus ONE other AF
LOW 4		AF2 `	AF3 	Plus at least ONE other AF at L4 from AFs 4-7		IE (insufficient evidence) ticked in more than TWO AFs It is possible that there is not enough evidence to make the assessment
LOW 5			AF3  at least, at level 4	Any 4 AFs at L5 from AFs 2,3,4,5,6,7

SECURE: Highlighting substantially evident across most, if not all, AFs					HIGH: Highlighting in all, or almost all, AFs – PLUS some criteria highlighted in the Level above

Refining the level judgement to Low, Secure, or High

Your decision should take account of how fully and consistently the criteria have been met and how far the pupil demonstrates independence and choice across a range of evidence.

19 THE UNMAKING OF THE CHINESE PROLETARIAT THE POLITICS
2 MAKING CAPITAL INVESTMENT DECISIONS ESTIMATION OF PROJECT CASH
2013 RULEMAKING TCE MSC CALCULATIONS NOTES 1 THE GROUNDWATER

Tags: assessment judgement, the assessment, making, reading, assessment, judgement, periodic, teacher, using