T he proposal
Title of proposal
|
Implementation of the revised Scheme of Salaries and Conditions of Service for Chief Officials of Local Authorities (Scotland)
|
Brief description of proposal (including intended outcomes & purpose) |
The Joint Negotiating Committee for Chief Officials of Local Authorities (Scotland) (referred to as SJNC) has revised the scheme of terms and conditions applicable to Chief Officials. The revised scheme of terms and conditions will come into effect on 1st April 2014. These national terms and conditions must be applied at a local level.
Within Fife Council there are, at the time of writing, 45 Chief Officials whose terms and conditions are negotiated by the SJNC. This means that the revisions affect these employees.
We have profiled the protected characteristics of this group of employees, as this will help us understand the impact of implementing the revised terms and conditions.
Of the 45 Chief Officials, 35 are male and 10 are female. None has disclosed a disability. The average age is 53. The distribution of Chief Officials across the age bands is as follows: 40 – 44 = 3 45 – 49 = 10 50 – 54 = 9 55 – 59 = 17 60 – 64 = 6
Because our data set is small, we have not presented here analysis by ethnic origin, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, sexual orientation, or religion or belief.
All Chief Officials work full-time, although part-time working is available and the provisions of flexible working apply.
The average length of continuous local government service is 26 years. The lowest length of service is 2 years and the longest is 40 years.
We have found that there are positive impacts, and that the revised terms and conditions will help us meet our commitment to advance equality. There are some impacts which our affected employees may be unhappy with, such as the reduction in their annual leave entitlement, but there are no negative impacts based on protected characteristics. |
Lead Directorate / Service / Partnership |
Human Resources |
EqIA lead person
|
Lee Ryan, HR Consultant |
EqIA contributors
|
|
Start date of EqIA
|
7th March 2014 |
Reference No.
|
EqIA/388/14/HR |
Which EqIA are you completing (please tick) |
X
|
Part 1: Initial Checklist
Note: Most decisions require the initial checklist to be completed; taking account of the three parts of the general duty (see p.2):
Identify the positive or negative impact of the proposal on those with a protected characteristic. Ensure that any staff impacts are also highlighted.
Highlight where there could be overlaps between the groups, for example, older and disabled people, any implications for Looked After Children & Careleavers and
You should also provide an explanation (including making reference to relevant evidence – see Appendix 1) of why a positive or negative impact has been chosen. Where there is no impact, record this on p.6 of the form below and send to the Equalities Unit.
Protected Characteristic/ Equality Group
|
Positive Impact (explain the benefit, including relevant evidence used to identify the positive impact) |
Negative Impact (explain the disadvantage, including relevant evidence used to identify the negative impact) |
Please rate each negative impact ‘low’, ‘medium’ or ‘high’
|
Disabled People |
The qualifying period for entitlement to occupational sick pay is reduced from 1 year to 26 weeks. This will benefit employees with short service who require time off due to sickness. This may benefit people with a disability, but no assumption or correlation with disability and sickness is being made. Similarly, the removal of the provision for a substitute day where sickness falls on a public holiday may be viewed unfavourably by affected employees, however, there is no negative impact on the grounds of disability.
|
None |
|
Sexual Orientation |
None |
None |
|
Women |
Maternity provisions have been expanded to reflect wider ‘family friendly’ provisions. This will benefit both women and men.
The removal of the provision for a substitute day where sickness falls on a public holiday may be viewed unfavourably by affected employees, however, there is no negative impact on the basis of sex.
The reduction of annual leave entitlement will affect both men and women. Women are more likely than men to have caring responsibilities and the reduction in annual leave entitlement may be viewed unfavourably by employees because it gives less planned time with children or other dependants. There is however no negative impact on the basis of sex.
|
None |
|
Men |
Maternity provisions have been expanded to reflect wider ‘family friendly’ provisions. This will benefit both women and men.
The removal of the provision for a substitute day where sickness falls on a public holiday may be viewed unfavourably by affected employees, however, there is no negative impact on the basis of sex.
The reduction of annual leave entitlement will affect both men and women. There is however no negative impact on the basis of sex.
|
None |
|
Transgendered People |
None |
None |
|
Race (includes gypsy travellers) |
None |
None |
|
Age (including older people aged 60+) |
None |
None |
|
Children and Young People (includes Looked After Children and Careleavers) |
None |
None |
|
Religion or Belief |
None |
None |
|
Pregnancy & maternity |
None |
None |
|
Marriage & civil partnership |
None |
None |
|
Please list below any actions that you plan to take as a result of any impact identified above (including any measures to increase positive impact).
Low or Medium Impact |
Action Required to remove or minimise impact |
Lead Person |
Timescale |
Any other comments (including any resource implications e.g. staffing, training etc.)
|
|
None.
|
|
|
|
No impact (please explain):
|
Date completed: ___04/04/2014__________
Date sent to Equalities Unit ___09/04/2014________________________
Senior officer name
and designation ____Fiona Allan, HR Manager Workforce Change_________________
All proposals which have been identified as having a negative impact (either high or medium) must proceed to Part 2, full equality impact assessment
Page
Proposal ii4 cms Convención Sobre las
&DHDOCDATE PROPOSAL &DHDOCNAME PREPARED FOR &DHSOLDTOCONTACT &DHSOLDTOTITLE PREPARED
(FORM E) R&D PROPOSAL [THE PROGRAM FOR TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION
Tags: proposal title, the proposal, proposal, title, implementation