M ONITORING PROJECT FINAL REPORT METRICS FORM OWEB RECEIVES

LIEBERT® SITESCAN® WEB LIEBERT® SITESCAN® WEB CRITICAL FACILITIES MONITORING
EQUALITY MONITORING FORM WHY WE NEED THIS
OBSERVATIONS FROM CAMERAS MONITORING SNAIL BEHAVIOUR MICHAEL RICHARDS1

PROJEKAT FINANSIRA EU PRIJAVNI OBRAZAC MONITORING
0611CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIAFINALDOC CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MONITORING THE HAYSTACK
11 PETUNJUK TEKNIS PANDUAN MONITORING EVALUASI DAN PELAPORAN SEKOLAHMADRASAH

Monitoring Metrics

M onitoring Project Final Report Metrics Form

OWEB receives a portion of its funds from the federal government and is required to report how its grantees have used those funds. The information you provide in the following form will be used for federal and state reporting purposes. Please complete all portions of the form below as they apply to your project. If you have any questions, please contact the OWEB Federal Reporting Coordinator at [email protected] or the OWEB Federal Reporting Assistant at [email protected]

If your project conducted Status and Trend Monitoring, Effectiveness Monitoring of a Restoration Project, or Landscape Scale Effectiveness Monitoring, complete Section A only.
If your project conducted a Rapid Bioassessment (RBA), complete Section B only.

Section A: Effectiveness or Status and Trend Monitoring

Reports Prepared: Identify reports prepared by the project (include project completion report submitted to OWEB, progress reports, and other non-OWEB reports).

Title	Author(s)	Date

reports (number of reports shown in table above).

Comprehensive Monitoring Strategy or Program and Cooperating Organizations:

2.a) Is this project a part of a comprehensive monitoring strategy/program?* (See explanation below)

Yes No

If yes, provide the name of the comprehensive monitoring strategy/program. If this project is not part of a comprehensive monitoring strategy/program, enter NONE below.

Name of document (Author, date, title, source, source address in Endnote citation format)

2.b) Identify Organizations cooperating with this project by concurrently conducting field work on other components of a Comprehensive Monitoring Strategy or Program.

Organization Names	Organization Names

# of Cooperators (number of cooperators shown in table above).

*The intent of questions 2.a and 2.b are to capture information on larger-scale or comprehensive monitoring efforts conducted by multiple entities (usually under an overarching or cooperative plan). The assumption is cooperating entities are working together to collect various aspects of integrated information (usually concurrently). For example, an OWEB funded project collected the salmon abundance/distribution data component of a salmon habitat restoration plan while other entities were collecting water quality, and/or habitat attribute data for the same comprehensive plan. Question 2.a asks for the name of the plan(s) and question 2.b asks for the name of the other entities involved in the cooperative collection of the data called for in that plan. If these questions are not relevant to this project enter ‘None’ for question 2.a and for 2.b answer ‘None’ for the cooperator names and answer 0 for the number of cooperators.

3. Total amount of area monitored under this monitoring project. If monitoring the same location or stream reach multiple times do not report the sum of area or length metric for each monitoring event. For example if the project monitors a 13-mile stream reach twice per year for 3 years you should report the metric as 13 stream miles.

Miles of stream monitored

Acres monitored

4. Identify the type of monitoring conducted and the area or stream length monitored.
Choose only one.

Monitoring Type	Total Acres Monitored	Total Stream Miles Monitored
Status and Trend
Effectiveness of Restoration
Landscape Scale Effectiveness

4.a) Provide a brief description explaining how you calculated totals for stream miles or total acres monitored

4.b) Did you monitor a specific project(s)?
Please identify the OWEB Grant #

If you monitored a non- OWEB project, identify the main project funder and the year the project was completed

If monitoring was not related to a specific project(s) select None

5. Identify the parameters monitored and the area or stream length monitored. Check all that apply.

Parameter Monitored	Acres Monitored	Stream Miles Monitored
Adult fish presence/absence/abundance/distribution survey(s)
Juvenile fish presence/absence/abundance/distribution survey(s)
Spawning surveys
Instream habitat surveys
Macroinvertebrates
Instream/Estuary biological monitoring (other than salmon or macroinvertebrates)
Other biological monitoring (bird counts, amphibian surveys, etc.)
Riparian vegetation
Invasive species
Upland vegetation
Water quality
Water quantity (surface, ground water)
Habitat surveys
Soil survey

6. If you checked Water Quality above, exactly which parameters did you monitor? Check all that apply

7. If you checked Riparian or Upland Vegetation above, exactly which parameters did you monitor? Check all that apply

Section B: Rapid Bioassessment

This monitoring project conducted a rapid bioassessment
Total acres of habitat encompassed or affected by rapid bioassessment (to nearest 0.1 acre)
Total miles of stream(s) evaluated/surveyed (to nearest 0.01 mile - do not double count areas of overlap)
Miles of stream(s) evaluated/surveyed that contained anadromous salmonids (to nearest 0.01 mile)
Miles of stream(s) evaluated/surveyed that needed restoration (to nearest 0.01 mile)
Number of fish passage impediments/barriers identified, if applicable

OWEB Monitoring Grant – Final Metrics – August 2021 Page 3

11%20-%20Monitoring%20of%20Expenses%20and%20Taxable%20Benefits%20-%20Mayor%20Elected%20Members%20and%20Senior%20Staff%20-%20Jan%2014%20t
12 MISSING FROM JOURNALS GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION
12-02-data-safety-and-monitoring-in-research-nov-2011

Tags: final report, – final, report, metrics, receives, project, final, onitoring