EFL TEACHER DEVELOPMENT COURSE UNPLUGGED AND CONNECTED WHERE IDEAS

BIRDBRAIN TEACHER’S NOTES © ADT 2004 COMPILED BY
DEAR PRESCHOOL OR KINDERGARTEN TEACHER WELCOME TO
PERSON SPECIFICATION CLASS TEACHER ESSENTIAL DESIRABLE

PERSON SPECIFICATION CLASS TEACHER 2018 ESSENTIAL DESIRABLE
SCU TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM PROFESSIONAL DISPOSITIONS OF
TEACHER RECRUITMENT DIFFICULTY CENSUS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

EFL TEACHER DEVELOPMENT COURSE UNPLUGGED AND CONNECTED WHERE IDEAS


EFL TEACHER DEVELOPMENT COURSE



Unplugged and connected: where ideas meet

Luke Meddings

Burcu Akyol


Pre-watch task:


What do you think the following expressions mean in relation to ELT:

Unplugged teaching;

EdTech;

a connected teacher

Personal Learning Network


Read the texts A Dogma for ELT and Teaching Unplugged (at the end of the Worksheet), do the task after the texts and then watch the video.




While-watching task:


  1. What is meant by “a connected teacher”?

  2. What is “Personal Learning Network”? How can a teacher stay in touch with their PLN?

  3. Is “being connected” and “teaching unplugged compatible”? Why \ why not?

  4. What are the recent developments in EdTech?

  5. Give examples of questions that teachers need to consider before using technology in class:


  1. Fill in the table

Name of the tool

Potential for unplugged teaching


Evernote

https://evernote.com/intl/ru/











Scoop.it










Linoit

http://en.linoit.com/










The link to the electronic worksheet: http://www.scoop.it/t/unplugged-and-connected




  1. What advantages of this approach are mentioned by the participants of the course that the presenters run?


A Dogma for EFL

Scott Thornbury

In 1995 a group of Danish film-makers, including Lars von Trier, signed a "vow of chastity" which became the manifesto of the Dogme 95 film-making collective. Their intention was to cleanse cinema of an obsessive concern for technique and rehabilitate a cinema which foregrounded the story, and the inner life of the characters. They rejected the superficiality and "trickery" of mainstream film-making. Films made according to Dogme 95 prescriptions (such as Thomas Vinterberg's Festen) typically have a rough, gritty, even raw, quality and are certainly a far remove from the slick artifice and technical virtuosity of Hollywood. You may not like Dogme films, but they are not easy to forget.

My belief is that it is high time Dogme-type principles were applied to the classroom. While EFL may seem to have little in common with Hollywood, it is certainly true that EFL teaching has never been so copiously resourced. Along with the quantity (I hesitate to use the word variety) of coursebooks in print, there is an embarrassment of complementary riches in the form of videos, CD-ROMs, photocopiable resource packs, pull-out word lists, and even web-sites, not to mention the standard workbook, teacher's book, and classroom and home study cassettes. Then there is the vast battery of supplementary materials available, as well as the authentic material easily downloadable from the Internet or illegally photocopied from more conventional sources. There are the best-selling self-study grammar books, personal vocabulary organisers, phrasal verb dictionaries, concordancing software packages - you name it. But where is the story? Where is the inner life of the student in all this? Where is real communication? More often as not, it is buried under an avalanche of photocopies, visual aids, transparencies, MTV clips and cuisennaire rods. Somewhere in there we lost the plot.

For several years now, my fellow Diploma teacher trainer, Neil Forrest, and I have been waging war on materials-driven lessons. The plaintive cry of an ex-student ("Our teacher never talked to us") cut straight to the quick. Too many observed lessons, we realized, were being hi-jacked, either by materials overload, or by Obsessive Grammar Syndrome (OGS). We laid down some rules: if the language lesson didn't include real language use, then we questioned its usefulness. Photocopies were proscribed; the OHP was banished. Grammar presentations had to be squeezed into 5 minutes. Real talk, usually relegated to the bookends of the lesson proper, had to form the lesson core. And the teacher had to talk - not at the students or even to them - but with them. No posturing was allowed.

What we were developing, I now realise, is a Dogme school of teaching. Dogme's first "commandment" is that :

Shooting should be done on location. Props and sets must not be brought in (if a particular prop is necessary for the story, a location must be chosen where the prop is to be found)

Translated into classroom terms this might read:

Teaching should be done using only the resources that teachers and students bring to the classroom - i.e. themselves - and whatever happens to be in the classroom. If a particular piece of material is necessary for the lesson, a location must be chosen where that material is to be found (e.g. library, resource centre, bar, students' club…)

Dogme also proscribes music being played that is not actually occuring where the scene is being shot. Nor is artificial lighting allowed. Nor optical work or filters. Nor tripods. In teaching terms, this rigorous rejection of the non-authentic might mean, for example, that

No recorded listening material should be introduced into the classroom: the source of all "listening" activities should be the students and teacher themselves. The only recorded material that is used should be that made in the classroom itself, e.g. recording students in pair or group work for later re-play and analysis.

But Dogme is not only about a stripped down , technology-free kind of film making. It is also about grounding the experience of the film (both its making and its viewing) in the real world:

Temporal and geographical alienation are forbidden. (That is to say that the film takes place here and now).

Learning, too, takes place in the here-and-now. What is learned is what matters. Teaching - like talk - should centre on the local and relevant concerns of the people in the room, not on the remote world of coursebook characters, nor the contrived world of grammatical structures. In the same spirit, Dogme is hostile to "genre movies", such as westerns, thrillers, and wacky comedies, since genres are another form of alienation - they map an artificial world on to the real one. Methods in language teaching - being generalised and simplistic solutions to local and complex situations - have the same distorting effect as genres. A Dogme school of teaching would take a dim view of imported methods, whether the Silent Way, the Natural Approach, the Direct Method, or hard line CLT. No methodological structures should interfere with, nor inhibit, the free flow of participant-driven input, output and feedback.

Are these Dogme-like prescriptions just another method? I hope not. The point is to restore teaching to its pre-method "state of grace" - when all there was was a room with a few chairs, a blackboard, a teacher and some students, and where learning was jointly constructed out of the talk that evolved in that simplest, and most prototypical of situations. Who, then, will join me and sign a Vow of EFL Chastity?





TEACHING UNPLUGGED

FOR A PEDAGOGY OF BARE ESSENTIALS


What is Teaching Unplugged?

We are teachers of English as a Second or Other Language (ESOL) who are committed to promoting a 'poor' pedagogy, that is, a pedagogy unburdened by an excess of materials and technology, a pedagogy grounded in the local and relevant concerns of the people in the room.

How did it start?

In February 2000 Scott Thornbury wrote an article called A Dogma for EFL in which he critiqued materials-driven teaching, and in which he invited ESOL teachers, trainers and writers to join him in a pedagogical 'vow of chastity'. By analogy, he adopted the principles (and name) of the Dogme 95 film collective, whose intention it was to rid film-making of an obsessive concern for technique and to rehabilitate a cinema which foregrounded the story, and the inner life of the characters. Scott's article struck a chord and an active email discussion group was formed, in which teachers, trainers and writers explored the possibilities of teaching in the spirit of Dogme - not a "method", let alone a "dogma" - more a state of mind. That state of mind is reborn as Teaching Unplugged.

http://www.thornburyscott.com/tu/description.htm

What is this site? The Dogme ELT egroup has run up over 600 postings in little over a year. This website represents an attempt to organise some of this rich material into a more coherent and accessible format. Here, for example, you will find source material that helps situate the thinking underlying Teaching Unplugged. By browsing some of their key postings, you can also tap into the voices of teachers who have contributed to the discussion forum. There are also resources for teachers in the form of descriptions of lessons from a wide range of contexts - lessons that are true to the spirit of Teaching Unplugged. Finally, we offer short courses and workshops to interested institutions.



An A-Z of ELT Scott Thornbury's blog

http://scottthornbury.wordpress.com/2010/02/28/d-is-for-dogme/










Task

Based on the texts formulate the main principles of Dogme and Unplugged teaching. Do you personally agree with any of them? Why?




EFL TEACHER DEVELOPMENT COURSE UNPLUGGED AND CONNECTED WHERE IDEAS

Департамент английского языка факультета экономики НИУ ВШЭ

Издательство Pearson ELT

ИЮНЬ 2013

EFL TEACHER DEVELOPMENT COURSE UNPLUGGED AND CONNECTED WHERE IDEAS



(TEACHERS’ SHARING) DRESS SENSE AND APPRECIATION OF FASHION AIMS
0 CADET TEACHER ACADEMY CADET TEACCADETHER ACADEMY CADET TEACHER
1 ST MARCH BRATISLAVA DEAR MY ENGLISH TEACHER I


Tags: connected teacher, “a connected, unplugged, course, where, connected, development, teacher, ideas