NZQA UNIT STANDARD 27056 VERSION 2 PAGE 3 OF

TYPE SMI TITLE HERE TAB+ENTER UK STANDARDS FOR MICROBIOLOGY
CHAPTER 13 MULTILEVEL ANALYSES BOX 132 STANDARDISATION OF
CHAPTER 6 COMPUTATION OF STANDARD ERRORS BOX 61

PKCS 15 CRYPTOGRAPHIC TOKEN INFORMATION FORMAT STANDARD (DRAFT) 54
PUBLIC DOMAIN CORRECTIONAL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS FOR MENS PRISONS IN
REC ITUR P8353 7 RECOMMENDATION ITUR P8353 REFERENCE STANDARD

27056 Monitor and review risk in an aviation environment

NZQA unit standard

27056 version 2


Page 3 of 3


Title

Monitor and review risk in an aviation environment

Level

5

Credits

15


Purpose

People credited with this unit standard are, in an aviation environment, able to: explain the aim and function of monitoring and reviewing risk; demonstrate knowledge of the methods and tools for monitoring and reviewing risk; develop a monitor and review plan; and finalise the risk management process.


Classification

Aviation > Aviation - Core


Available grade

Achieved


Guidance Information


1 Resources may include but are not limited to – Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand. 2009. AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009 Risk Management – principles and guidelines. Sydney and Wellington: Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand.


2 All references to the CAA refer specifically to the Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand.


3 Industry standards are those set in place by the CAA.


4 Industry texts may include but are not limited to – AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009, CAA Rules, CAA Advisory Circulars, operator exposition.


5 Definition

Knowledge refers to the knowledge, understanding, and application of the subject matter.


Outcomes and performance criteria


Outcome 1


Explain the aim and function of monitoring and reviewing risk in an aviation environment.


Performance criteria


1.1 The terms ‘monitor’ and ‘review’ are defined in accordance with industry texts.


1.2 The function of monitoring and reviewing risks is described in accordance with industry texts.


1.3 The purpose of the monitoring and reviewing processes is explained in accordance with industry texts.


1.4 Stakeholders responsible for monitoring and reviewing risks are identified.


1.5 The characteristics of risks that will be monitored and reviewed are described in accordance with industry texts.


Outcome 2


Demonstrate knowledge of the methods and tools for monitoring and reviewing risk in an aviation environment.


Performance criteria


2.1 Methods and tools for monitoring and reviewing risks are described in accordance with industry standards and texts.


2.2 Methods and tools for monitoring and reviewing risk management process are described in accordance with industry standards and texts.


2.3 Methods and tools to monitor and review risks and the risk management process are utilised in accordance with industry standards and texts.


2.4 How monitoring and reviewing fits into each step of the risk management process are identified and explained in accordance with industry standards and texts.


Outcome 3


Develop a monitor and review plan in an aviation environment.


Performance criteria


3.1 A plan to formally and informally review the risks and the risk treatment action plan is developed. A performance measurement system by which to determine if the risk treatment strategies are adequate in accordance with industry standards and texts is included.


3.2 The reports from the ongoing review of the risks and risk treatment action plan internally, and externally as required, are used in accordance with industry standards and texts.


3.3 Review of the monitor and review plan is scheduled on a regular basis to ensure its ongoing appropriateness in accordance with industry standards and texts.


Range includes but is not limited to – timeliness of monitoring and reviewing processes, identification of person(s) responsible for monitor and review plan, measures to monitor and review risk treatment and emerging risks.


Outcome 4


Finalise the risk management process in an aviation environment.


Performance criteria


4.1 A records system, which provides the foundation for improvement in the risk management process, is described in accordance with industry standards and texts.


Range includes but is not limited to – ease of access to records for stakeholders, record identification system, version control, historical data retention, periodic evaluation of record system, use of technology.


4.2 A records system for the risk management process outcomes is established in accordance with industry standards and texts.


Range must include but is not limited to – risk assessments, risk treatments plans, monitor and review plans.



Planned review date

31 December 2020


Status information and last date for assessment for superseded versions

Process

Version

Date

Last Date for Assessment

Registration

1

15 April 2011

N/A

Rollover

2

26 April 2018

N/A


Consent and Moderation Requirements (CMR) reference

0170

This CMR can be accessed at http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/framework/search/index.do.


Comments on this unit standard


Please contact ServiceIQ [email protected] if you wish to suggest changes to the content of this unit standard.

ServiceIQ

SSB Code 9068

Ó New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2021



SEKTOR ZA SPLOŠNO METODOLOGIJO IN STANDARDE ŠTEVILKA 007492007 DATUM
STANDARDIZING OUTOFBAND MANAGEMENT CONSOLE OUTPUT AND TERMINAL EMULATION (VTUTF8
3 TSAGTD568 INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION


Tags: 27056 version, version, standard, 27056