ON THE ROLE OF ALUMINIUM IN SEGREGATION AND BANDING

ALUMINIUM ALUMINIUM IS THE MOST ABUNDANT METALLIC ELEMENT AND
CHINA’S FIRST PURPOSEBUILT ALUMINIUM BODY SHOP LAUNCHED THE ALLNEW
LEISTUNGSBESCHREIBUNG ALUMINIUM LIFTER CARLO ALU COMFORT EP 230 BEKA

LEISTUNGSVERZEICHNIS BAUVORHABEN POSITION LEISTUNGSBESCHREIBUNG EINH PREIS GESAMTBETRAG ALUMINIUMPTZTAGNACHTKAMERA PTZKAMERA
ON THE ROLE OF ALUMINIUM IN SEGREGATION AND BANDING
RAW MATERIALS ALUMINIUM SLAB 2MM THICKNESS THE FIRST PRODUCT

Information for Authors of HSLA Steel 2005 and ISUGS 2005 Proceedings

On the role of aluminium in segregation and banding in multiphase steel


ENNIS Bernard1, 2, MOSTERT Richard1, JIMENEZ-MELERO Enrique2, LEE Peter2

(1. Tata Steel, PO Box 10000, 1970 CA IJmuiden, The Netherlands;

2. The School of Materials, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK)



Abstract: Despite considerable attention in the literature on the origin and effects of chemical segregation in steels and the resultant effect on microstructure, the focus has been mainly on carbon and manganese, with minimum attention paid to other alloying additions, and none on the role of aluminium. Therefore, a systematic study of the effect of aluminium on segregation and banding in multiphase steel is presented here. It is shown that Al segregates preferentially to the solid during solidification, in contrast to the other elements which segregate preferentially to the liquid. In addition to the segregation and the resultant continuous band at the centre-line, it has been demonstrated that interdendritic segregation during casting leads to microstructural banding. Furthermore a new numerical model is presented for predicting the effect of carbon, aluminium, manganese, silicon and chromium on the austenite to ferrite transformation temperature, Ae3.


Key words: Steel, casting, segregation, phase transformation, thermomechanical processing


1 Introduction

From an industrial point of view, elimination of the banded phase is a complex task. However, even for cases where complete removal of banding is not economically feasible, the detrimental influence of a banded microstructure can be significantly reduced by altering the morphology of the band in order to (a) avoid microstructures with continuous bands and (b) decrease the thickness variation of the band. Although in principle it is possible to eliminate the Mn segregation by high temperature homogenisation treatment, as proposed by Kumar,[1] due to the low diffusion rate of this element such a treatment is not practicable in the common industrial route. On the other hand, the severity of banding can be significantly reduced by selecting process settings during hot rolling and cooling on the run-out-table. In particular coarse austenite grains and high cooling rate has a beneficial effect of in reducing the severity of microstructural banding.


A predictive model quantifying the effects of thermomechanical treatment on band prevention is then of great use. One of these models has been developed by Offerman for hot-rolled, medium carbon steel.[2] In this model the ferrite nucleation rates are calculated in composition distinctive regions of Mn, Si and Cr; and based on experimental data, it is postulated that when the difference in ferrite nucleation rates exceeds 6–8%, ferrite/pearlite banding occurs.


Xu et al further developed this concept by combining it with the calculation of segregation due to solidification employing a thermochemical database combined with diffusion theory and classical nucleation theory.[3] The influence of processing parameters in banding was calculated for a number of industrial steel grades by introducing “band prevention plots” as a means to relate the austenitisation and overaging temperatures with the austenitisation time and micro-chemical wavelength. Their results were consistent with the experimentally observed conditions for ferrite/pearlite band prevention reported for a number of steel grades in the literature. It was reported that ferrite/pearlite banding disappears when the austenite grain size exceeds the chemical banding wavelength by a factor 2 or 3, since the influence of grain boundaries as a preferred sites for nucleation dominates the effect of the compositional gradient.


For the critical case of reducing the severity of banding in DP steels, for example, this may be achieved by optimising the critical production parameters (e.g. rate of cooling during hot rolling, intercritical annealing temperature, soaking duration) that have a significant influence on the degree of banding. The work of Mecozzi [4,5] on the cellular automata simulation (CAS) programme has shown that the chemical segregation of a number of elements present in AHSS (namely Mn, Al, Cr) are important pre-cursors to banding after hot-rolling. With regard to the effect of cooling rate, the difference of the start temperature for ferrite nucleation in high and low Mn regions is reduced by increasing the cooling rate and therefore a more homogeneous microstructure is created upon cooling. The preliminary model results show a good agreement with experimental results for banded structures in the hot-rolled condition based on line scan measurements of AHSS.


Cold-rolling and annealing is necessary to achieve the thicknesses and mechanical properties required for most automotive products. During the annealing of cold-rolled material, recovery and recrystallisation occur at lower temperatures than those required for austenite transformation. Furthermore, the aforementioned alloying elements affect the austenite transformation temperature on heating and cooling.


As has already been demonstrated, Mn is the alloy element that is primarily responsible for the development of microstructural banding in steels due to the effect of this element on the ferrite/austenite equilibrium temperature Ae3. Ferrite starts to form during cooling in bands with low Mn content (high Ae3) because the local undercooling favours nucleation. The formation of ferrite is accompanied by the rejection of C into the adjacent high Mn bands; these C and Mn rich austenite bands later transform to pearlite resulting in a banded ferrite and pearlite microstructure.


Caballero et al [6] investigated the relationship between chemical segregation, hot-strip mill processing and annealing parameters on the incidence of microstructural banding. They found that the segregation of manganese during solidification from casting is responsible for banding problems of dual phase steel. The study revealed although that banding increasing the cooling rate during hot rolling does suppress the formation of ferrite-pearlite banding, this is only true of the intermediate microstructure. Upon intercritical annealing at high temperatures (in this case 800°C), the degree of banding increases as the transformation proceeds until finally it resembles the original chemical segregation. However, it was shown that permanently eliminating microstructural banding was possible by annealing low in the intercritical range (750°C) with a longer soaking time (100 s).


It is therefore evident that although the effects of banding brought about by chemical segregation during casting can be suppressed by careful selection of hot-rolling parameters, this can be undone during annealing. In this work, the model outlined by Bos and Mecozzi [4,5,7] will be used to generate microstructures in materials with and without centre-line segregation. By judicious choice of hot-rolling and annealing parameters four variants will be produced for investigating the effect of banding and segregation on the mechanical behaviour: segregated and banded, segregated and non-banded, non-segregated and banded and non-segregated and non-banded. A description of the model, insofar as it pertains to this work, will be provided in section Error: Reference source not found along with the resulting microstructures.


References:

[1] Kumar A.N. and Basu S.N. Manganese partitioning and dual-phase characteristics in a microalloyed steel. J Mater Sci, 1991, 262089~2092.

[2] Offerman S.E., van Dijk N.H., Rekveldt M.T., Sietsma J. and van der Zwaag S. Ferrite/pearlite band formation in hot rolled medium carbon steel. Mater Sci Technol, 2002, 18297~303.

[3] Xu W., Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo P.E.J. and van der Zwaag S. Ferrite/pearlite band prevention in dual phase and TRIP steels: model development. ISIJ Intl, 2005, 45(3): 380~387.

[4] Mecozzi M.G., Bos C. and Sietsma J. Microstructure modelling of solid-state transformations in low-alloy steel production. Mater Sci Forum, 2012, 706-7092782~2787.

[5] Bos C., Mecozzi M.G. and Sietsma J. A microstructure model for recrystallisation and phase transformation during the dual-phase steel annealing cycle. Comp Mater Sci, 2010, 4692~699.

[6] Caballero F.G., García-Junceda A., Capdevila C. and García de Andrés C. Evolution of microstructural banding during the manufacturing process of dual phase steels. Mater Trans, 2006, 47(9): 2269~2276.

[7] Bos C., Mecozzi M.G., Hanlon D.N., Aarnts M.P. and Sietsma J. Application of a three-dimensional microstructure evolution model to identify key process settings for the production of dual-phase steels. Metall Mater Trans A, 2011, 42(12): 3602~3610.





TENDER SPECIFICATION TEXT CRAWFORD DS6060A CURTAIN DOCK SHELTER ALUMINIUM
TRANSIENT LIQUID PHASE BONDING OF TITANIUM TO ALUMINIUM NITRIDE
[FSUEN14349] USINAGE PLAQUES ALUMINIUM BYPASS CABLE ET CABLAGE WAGONS


Tags: aluminium in, of aluminium, segregation, aluminium, banding