ARTICLE CODE………… ARTICLE REVIEW IN GENERAL AND PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION

 ARTICLE 32 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 2001 TO
6 ARTICLE 6B INTERIM CASINO AUTHORIZATION 5129512
ARTICLES L 851 1 À L8514 ET R

!DOCTYPE HTML HTML LANGESES DIRLTR CLASSCOMCONTENT VIEWARTICLE ITEMID564 J31
!DOCTYPE IUCRART PUBLIC IUCRDTD IUCR ARTICLE DTD V11ENIUCRART JIDD000000
(city and Date) Review of a Scientific Article „the

Recenzja artykułu do ZN Akademii Morskiej w Szczecinie

Article code………….

Article review in General and Professional Education

REVIEWER……………………………………………………………………………………………………..

(academic title, degree, name and surname)

Home address (or office address)……………………………………………………………………………….

(location, zip code, street, house number, apartment)


Title of the paper…………………………………………………………………………………………………



The type and characteristics of work: theoretical, experimental, survey………………………………………………….

(underline the right option or enter its name)


Detailed comments (please mark the appropriate answer)


Assessment type

Assessment

yes

no

Difficult to assess

1.

Does the paper bear the character of the article to be published in GaPE?





2.

Does the content of the paper have significance for theory or practice?





3.

Doe the content of the article correspond to its title?





4.

It the topic urgent?





5.

Is the aim (aims) and the hypothesis (hypotheses) of the article clearly stated?





6.

Has the author presented the results distinctly?





7.

Are the results original?





8.

Are the obtained results practically important?





9.

Are the methods implemented original?





10.

Can the results of the research be used by other researchers in the same field?





11.

Is the choice of literature precise and sufficient?





12.

Is the paper written in a correct language, does the terminology obey the accepted norms (e.g., SI system)?





13.

Is the illustrative material (figures, tables) correct?





14.

Does the abstract convey the contents of the paper well?






Conclusion (note or underline the correct point):
1. Is the article accepted for publication:
In its current form and scope
• After editing
• After the substantive amendments of the article
After a complete redesign
• After the addition or expansion of the research
2. The article is not accepted for publication
3. Other comments enter below (rationale of the publication, etc.) or in the text of the paper

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………….………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………


…………………………………………… ……………………………………..

(locality, date) (reviewer’s signature)

E-mailed reviews do not require signature


(DATA OF THE ARTICLE AUTHOR 1) (PLACE AND DATE
(restated) Articles of Incorporation of the Minnesota Archaeological Society
0 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 18 PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE


Tags: article code…………., the article, article, general, review, professional, education, code…………