CRITICAL APPROACHES TO LITERATURE AND CRITICISM 1 READERRESPONSE—FOCUSES

LIEBERT® SITESCAN® WEB LIEBERT® SITESCAN® WEB CRITICAL FACILITIES MONITORING
1 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTSTRAINING PLAN FOR DM IN CRITICAL CARE
12 PHILOSOPHY 1100 INTRODUCTION TO ETHICS CRITICAL THINKING –

13 DELIRIUM SCREENING IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS A SYSTEMATIC
2012 2013 9 HONORS CRITICAL ANALYSIS INDEPENDENT READ
23 CHARTING TWO CRITICAL MAPS FOR PRC MINISTRY TEN

Critical Approaches to Literature and Criticism – Tomaneng, Patton, & Abrams

Critical Approaches to Literature and Criticism


  1. Reader-Response—Focuses on the reader (or "audience") and his or her experience of a literary work, in contrast to other schools and theories that focus attention primarily on the author or the content and form of the work.


  1. Feminist Criticism—Focuses on female representation in literature, paying attention to female points of view, concerns, and values. Three underlying assumptions in this approach are: Western Society is pervasively patriarchal, male centered and controlled, and is organized in such a way as to subordinate women; the concept of gender is socially constructed, not biologically determined; and that patriarchal ideology pervades those writings which have been considered “great works of literature.”

  1. Queer Theory—Combined area of gay and lesbian studies and criticism, including studies of variations in biological sex, gender identity, and sexual desires. Emphasis on dismantling the key binary oppositions of Western culture: male/ female, heterosexual/ homosexual, etc. by which the first category is assigned privilege, power, and centrality, while the second is derogated, subordinated, and marginalized.


  1. Marxist Criticism—Focuses on how literary works are products of the economic and ideological determinants specific to that era. Critics examine the relationship of a literary product to the actual economic and social reality of its time and place (Class stratification, class relations, and dominant ideology).


  1. Historical Criticism—Focuses on examining a text primarily in relation to the historical and cultural conditions of its production, and also of its later critical interpretations. Cultural materialism, a mode of NHC, argues that whatever the “textuality” of history, a culture and its literary products are always conditioned by the real material forces and relations of production in their historical era.

  1. Psychological Criticism—Focuses on a work of literature primarily as an expression, in fictional form, of the state of mind and the structure of personality of the individual author. In other words, a literary text is related to its author’s mental and emotional traits. Furthest extension is Psychoanalytic Criticism, emphasis on phallic symbols, wombs, breasts, etc. Theorists include Lacan and Klein.


  1. New Criticism—The proper concern of literary criticism is not with the external circumstances or effects or historical position of a work, but with a detailed consideration of the work itself as an independent entity. Emphasis on “the words on the page.” Study of poetry focuses on the “autonomy of the work as existing for its own sake,” analysis of words, figures of speech, and symbols. Distinctive procedure is close reading and attention to recurrent images; these critics delight in “tension,” “irony,” and “paradox.” (Similar to Formalism or Neo-Aristotelian)


  1. Deconstruction—Focuses on the practice of reading a text in order to “subvert” or “undermine” the assumption that the text can be interpreted coherently to have a universal determinate meaning. Typically, deconstructive readings closely examine the conflicting forces/meanings within the text in order to show that the text has an indefinite array of possible readings/significations.


  1. Archetypal/Mythic Criticism—Focuses on recurrent narrative designs, patterns of action, character types, or images which are said to be identifiable in a wide variety of literary works, myths, dreams, and even ritualized modes of behavior. Critics tend to emphasize the mythical patterns in literature, such as the death-rebirth theme and journey of the hero.


10. Cultural Criticism—This lens examines the text from the perspective of cultural attitudes and often focuses on individuals within society who are marginalized or face discrimination in some way. Cultural criticism may consider race, gender, religion, ethnicity, sexuality or other characteristics that separate individuals in society and potentially lead to one feeling or being treated as “less than” another. It suggests that being included or excluded from the dominant culture changes the way one may view the text.


11. Modernism/Post-Modernism—Modernism is a rejection of traditional forms of literature (chronological plots, continuous narratives, closed endings etc.) in favor of experimental forms. They have nostalgia for the past that they feel is lost so Modernist texts often include multiple allusions. Post-Modernists follow the same principles but celebrate the new forms of fragmentation rather than lamenting them.


12. Mythological Criticism—This approach emphasizes “the recurrent universal patterns underlying most literary works.” Combining the insights from anthropology, psychology, history, and comparative religion, mythological criticism “explores the artist’s common humanity by tracing how the individual imagination uses myths and symbols common to different cultures and epochs.” One key concept in mythological criticism is the archetype, “a symbol, character, situation, or image that evokes a deep universal response,” which entered literary criticism from Swiss psychologist Carl Jung. According to Jung, all individuals share a “‘collective unconscious,’ a set of primal memories common to the human race, existing below each person’s conscious mind”—often deriving from primordial phenomena such as the sun, moon, fire, night, and blood, archetypes according to Jung “trigger the collective unconscious.” Another critic, Northrop Frye, defined archetypes in a more limited way as “a symbol, usually an image, which recurs often enough in literature to be recognizable as an element of one’s literary experience as a whole.” Regardless of the definition of archetype they use, mythological critics tend to view literary works in the broader context of works sharing a similar pattern.


13. Post-Colonialism Criticism—Post-colonialism literature is most commonly written about countries that have been previously colonized. A post-colonial lens would approach literature and look for what effects colonization has left on a society or on individual characters. This criticism looks through literature with the post-colonial theory. It shows history and the effects that colonization can leave on a civilization even after they have gained independence. The post-colonialism critical lens interprets the challenges and changes of a previously colonized nation as the effects of colonization. The major important symbols are oppression and power. There is an identity between the colonizer and the colonized. The goal of the critical lens is to seek to understand the behavior of characters or the society. It can be analyzed by the setting and the actions or behaviors depicted by characters in literature can be attributed to their country being previously colonized. Characters or society can feel torn between the identities of their native culture and the culture of the colonizing country. A reader needs to have a good grasp of historical knowledge in order to fully apply the post colonialism lens to literature. A reader has to be aware of the previous or current colonial status of any countries or societies that are presented in a work of literature.


14. Moral/Ethical Criticism—The moral/intellectual critical approach is concerned with content and values.  The approach is as old as literature itself, for literature is a traditional mode of imparting morality, philosophy, and religion.  The concern in moral/intellectual criticism is not only to discover meaning but also to determine whether works of literature are both true and significant. To study literature from the moral/intellectual perspective is therefore to determine whether a work conveys a lesson or message and whether it can help readers lead better lives and improve their understanding of the world: What ideas does the work contain?  How strongly does the work bring forth its ideas?  What application do the ideas have to the work’s characters and situations?  How may the ideas be evaluated intellectually?  Morally?  Discussions based on such questions do not imply that literature is primarily a medium of moral and intellectual exhortation.  Ideally, moral/intellectual criticism should differ from sermonizing to the degree that readers should always be left with their own decisions about whether to assimilate the ideas of a work and about whether the ideas—and values—are personally or morally acceptable. Sophisticated critics have sometimes demeaned the moral/intellectual approach on the grounds that “message hunting” reduces a work’s artistic value by treating it like a sermon or political speech; but the approach will be valuable as long as readers expect literature to be applicable to their own lives. 



For more on Literary Theory, check out the Purdue Online Writing Lab: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/722/1/


26_43_13_51_SPD_EXTERNAL_CRITICAL
2X350 MW SUPERCRITICAL COALFIRED POWER PLANT ESIA – SCOPING
34985 PROCUREMENT PLAN FOR THE INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT OF CRITICAL


Tags: approaches to, criticism, readerresponse—focuses, critical, approaches, literature