Peer Rating of Team Members
Part A
Please write below the names of your team members, INCLUDING YOURSELF, and rate the degree to which each member fulfilled his/her responsibilities in completing group work. These ratings should reflect each individual’s level of participation, effort, and sense of responsibility—not his or her academic ability. Please be honest. The possible ratings are as follows:
Excellent |
Consistently went above and beyond, tutored teammates, carried more than his/her fair share of the load
|
Very Good |
Consistently did what he/she was supposed to do, very well prepared and cooperative
|
Satisfactory |
Usually did what he/she was supposed to do, very well prepared and cooperative
|
Ordinary |
Often did what he/she was supposed to do, minimally prepared and occasionally less than cooperative
|
Marginal |
Sometimes failed to show up for group meetings or to complete assignments, missed deadlines, rarely prepared
|
Deficient |
Often failed to show up or complete assignments, usually unprepared, frequently uncooperative or disengaged
|
Unsatisfactory |
Consistently failed to show up or complete assignments, chronically unprepared
|
Superficial |
Practically no participation
|
No Show |
No participation at all
|
|
Name of Team Member |
Rating |
You are: |
_________________________ |
_____________________________ |
|
_________________________ |
_____________________________ |
|
_________________________ |
_____________________________ |
|
_________________________ |
_____________________________ |
|
_________________________ |
_____________________________ |
Justification of Self and Peer Ratings
Part B
Write three to four succinct statements that justify the self-rating given above. For example, how was your level of participation beyond what was expected? How innovative were you in the problem-solving situation? Did you fall short of your own expectations? How?
Write two to three succinct statements that justify the rating that you gave to each member of your group. For example, how was their level of participation beyond what was expected? How innovative were they in the problem-solving situation? Was the person receptive to ideas that were expressed?
1 THE OPERATING COMMITTEE OF UNITED STATES POWER SQUADRONS
10102018 THE DIFFRACTION GRATING TO MEASURE THE WAVELENGTH OF
112 REVISED 92011 CREDIT AND DEBT MANAGEMENT OPERATING STANDARDS
Tags: members part, write, rating, members, please