PEER RATING OF TEAM MEMBERS PART A PLEASE WRITE

FOOD HYGIENE RATING SCHEME APPEAL FORM NOTES
LICENSE APPLICATION FOR A RATING ORGANIZATION – ARS
SEARCH AND RESCUE MODEL OPERATING PLAN A GUIDE

(EDITOR NOTE THIS IS A GENERALLY ACCEPTED RATING SYSTEM
010116 700b301d Bridge Load Rating Calculations and Summary (revised
06%20EMMA%20Form%203%20-%20Voluntary%20Performance%20Rating

PEER RATING OF TEAM MEMBERS

Peer Rating of Team Members

Part A


Please write below the names of your team members, INCLUDING YOURSELF, and rate the degree to which each member fulfilled his/her responsibilities in completing group work. These ratings should reflect each individual’s level of participation, effort, and sense of responsibility—not his or her academic ability. Please be honest. The possible ratings are as follows:


Excellent

Consistently went above and beyond, tutored teammates, carried more than his/her fair share of the load


Very Good

Consistently did what he/she was supposed to do, very well prepared and cooperative


Satisfactory

Usually did what he/she was supposed to do, very well prepared and cooperative


Ordinary

Often did what he/she was supposed to do, minimally prepared and occasionally less than cooperative


Marginal

Sometimes failed to show up for group meetings or to complete assignments, missed deadlines, rarely prepared


Deficient

Often failed to show up or complete assignments, usually unprepared, frequently uncooperative or disengaged


Unsatisfactory

Consistently failed to show up or complete assignments, chronically unprepared


Superficial

Practically no participation


No Show

No participation at all




Name of Team Member

Rating

You are:

_________________________

_____________________________


_________________________

_____________________________


_________________________

_____________________________


_________________________

_____________________________


_________________________

_____________________________








Justification of Self and Peer Ratings

Part B





Write three to four succinct statements that justify the self-rating given above. For example, how was your level of participation beyond what was expected? How innovative were you in the problem-solving situation? Did you fall short of your own expectations? How?













Write two to three succinct statements that justify the rating that you gave to each member of your group. For example, how was their level of participation beyond what was expected? How innovative were they in the problem-solving situation? Was the person receptive to ideas that were expressed?





1 THE OPERATING COMMITTEE OF UNITED STATES POWER SQUADRONS
10102018 THE DIFFRACTION GRATING TO MEASURE THE WAVELENGTH OF
112 REVISED 92011 CREDIT AND DEBT MANAGEMENT OPERATING STANDARDS


Tags: members part, write, rating, members, please