COMMUNITY WORKS BUILDING BETTER OPPORTUNITIES PROJECT MONITORING AND EVALUATION

little Hultonwalkden Community Committee 26th July 2004 Walkden Congregational
DONNA SAULSBERRY DONA ANA BRANCH COMMUNITY COLLEGE P O
BEVILL STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE LIBRARIES ASSIGNMENT ALERT

BEVILL STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE LIBRARIES LIBRARY SERVICES
BIS SCIENCE AND SOCIETY COMMUNITY CHALLENGE GRANT SCHEME
CLALLAM COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

Community Works

COMMUNITY WORKS BUILDING BETTER OPPORTUNITIES PROJECT MONITORING AND EVALUATION COMMUNITY WORKS BUILDING BETTER OPPORTUNITIES PROJECT MONITORING AND EVALUATION



Community Works

Building Better Opportunities

Project Monitoring and Evaluation Framework


This monitoring and evaluation framework should be read in conjunction with the Building Better Opportunities guidance on collecting and reporting participant information and the ESF participant entry, progress and exit forms appended with this document. In addition, the reporting Excel spreadsheet and the other required finance forms (available from the BBO website) should be used to return information to the funder. There is also an initial assessment form and a follow-up assessment form that have been designed to track participant progress against the specific outcomes for this project, which are also appended.


Monitoring and Evaluation


Monitoring targets and outcomes plan

The table below shows the project targets with the milestones, timescales and indicating how the evidence for each target will be collected.and are reported on ANNEX L, E AND THE MASTER TARGETS SCHEDULE











PROJECT TARGETS

Project Outputs

Output

Anticipated Target

Milestone

Timescale

How Evidenced will be Collected

Output 1


Number of people engaged in activities to increase their work readiness



Number of people engaged in activities to increase their work readiness over project lifetime




Output 2

120 unemployed and economically inactive people

240 unemployed and economically inactive people

  • 43 unemployed and economically inactive people engaged in work readiness activities

  • 146 unemployed and economically inactive people engaged in work readiness activities

  • 240 unemployed and economically inactive people engaged in work readiness activities

By end of year 1 (5 months delivery)



By end of year 2

(12 months delivery)



By end of year 3

(11 months delivery)

Participant Entry Form and Participant Progress Form

Output 3

60 men

120 men

  • 21 men engaged in work readiness activities

  • 73 men engaged in work readiness activities

  • 120 men engaged in work readiness activities

By end of year 1


By end of year 2


By end of year 3

Participant Entry Form

Output 4

60 women

120 women

  • 21 women engaged in work readiness activities

  • 73 women engaged in work readiness activities

  • 120 women engaged in work readiness activities

By end of year 1

By end of year 2

By end of year 3

Participant Entry Form

Output 5

80 unemployed

160 unemployed

  • 27 unemployed people engaged in work readiness activities

  • 95 unemployed people engaged in work readiness activities

  • 160 unemployed people engaged in work readiness activities

By end of year 1


By end of year 2


By end of year 3

Participant Entry Form

Output 6

40 economically inactive

80 economically inactive

  • 14 economically inactive people engaged in work readiness activities

  • 49 people engaged in work readiness activities

  • 80 economically inactive people engaged in work readiness activities

By end of year 1


By end of year 2

By end of year 3

Participant Entry Form

Output 7

14 aged 50 or over

28 aged 50 or over

  • 5 over 50 year olds engaged in work readiness activities

  • 17 over 50 year olds engaged in work readiness activities

  • 28 over 50 year olds engaged in work readiness activities

By end of year 1


By end of year 2


By end of year 3

Participant Entry Form

Output 8

12 with disabilities

24 with disabilities

  • 4 people with disabilities engaged in work readiness activities

  • 14 people with disabilities engaged in work readiness activities

  • 24 people with disabilities engaged in work readiness activities

By end of year 1



By end of year 2



By end of year 3

Participant Entry Form

Output 9

20 from ethnic minorities

40 from ethnic minorities

  • 7 people from ethnic minorities engaged in work readiness activities

  • 24 people from ethnic minorities engaged in work readiness activities

  • 40 people from ethnic minorities engaged in work readiness activities

By end of year 1


By end of year 2


By end of year 3

Participant Entry Form









PROJECT RESULTS

Percentage achieving a result

Numbers achieving a result




Result 1

10% moving into education or training

24 people moving into education or training

  • 4 people moving into education or training

  • 14 people moving into education or training

  • 24 people moving into education or training

By end of year 1


By end of year 2


By end of year 3

Participant Exit Form

Result 2

8% moving into employment or self-employment

  • 70% of these unemployed

  • 30% economically inactive

19 moving into employment or self-employment

  • 14 unemployed

  • 5 economically inactive


  • 4 people moving into employment or self-employment (3 unemployed / 1 economically inactive)

  • 12 people moving into employment or self-employment ( 9 unemployed / 3 economically inactive)

  • 19 people moving into employment or self-employment ( 14 unemployed / 5 economically inactive)

By end of year 1




By end of year 2




By end of year 3

Participant Exit Form


Result 3

38% economically inactive moving in job search

30 economically inactive moving into job search

  • 5 economically inactive people moving into job search

  • 18 economically inactive people moving into job search

  • 30 economically inactive people moving into job search

By end of year 1


By end of year 2


By end of year 3

Participant Progress Form and Participant Exit Form


Timescale: Year 1 (Sept 2016-March 2017 – 2 months set up 5 months delivery)

Year 2 (Apr 2017-Mar 2018 – 12 months)

Year 3 (Apr 2018-Feb 2019 – 11 months)





THESE TARGETS ARE REPORTED ON ANNEX L, E AND THE MASTER TARGETS SCHEDULE















The table below shows the projected outcomes for project participants, the indicators for change and where the evidence of these will be captured.



Project Outcomes

Project Outcome

Indicators of Change

( as a result of project activities)

Numbers /

Timescale

How Evidenced will be Collected

Outcome 1


Unemployed and economically inactive people, will have addressed at least one barrier preventing employment, and increased their resilience, as a result of project support.



    1. Unemployed and economically inactive people will have been supported to identify barriers to employment and put a plan in place to address them.

    1. Unemployed and economically inactive people will have been supported to address at least one barrier to employment


    1. Unemployed and economically inactive people will report increased ability to handle set backs

43 year 1

102 year 2

95 year 3


34 year 1

82 year 2

76 year 3


30 year 1

72 year 2

66 year 3


Participant Action and Development Plan


Use of the initial assessment form and follow-up assessment form

Outcome 2


Unemployed and economically inactive people will experience increased social inclusion, and will have improved their well-being, moving them closer to work, as a result of project activities.


    1. Unemployed and economically inactive people will be engaged in learning, training, or a work placement


    1. Unemployed and economically inactive people will report meeting new people, increasing social networks or starting volunteering


    1. Unemployed and economically inactive people will report improved well-being

34 year 1

82 year 2

76 year 3


34 year 1

82 year 2

76 year 3


34 year 1

82 year 2

76 year 3


Use of the initial assessment form and follow-up assessment form



Participant Exit Form

Outcome 3


Unemployed and economically inactive people will have improved work / life skills, and increased capacity for independent activity, as a result of project activities.

    1. Unemployed and economically inactive people will have been supported to access learning, training or work placement opportunities


    1. Unemployed and economically inactive people will report an increased ability to access learning, personal development and employment opportunities


    1. Unemployed and economically inactive people will report improved work / life skills


43 year 1

102 year 2

95 year 3


34 year 1

82 year 2

76 year 3



34 year 1

82 year 2

76 year 3


Use of the initial assessment form and follow-up assessment form


Participant Exit Form

Outcome 4


Unemployed and economically inactive people will increase their employability and self-confidence.

    1. Unemployed and economically inactive people will engage in learning opportunities, Information, Advice and Guidance Sessions, or work placements.

    2. Unemployed and economically inactive people will report increased self- confidence



    1. Unemployed and economically inactive people will report increased employability

43 year 1

102 year 2

95 year 3


34 year 1

82 year 2

76 year 3


34 year 1

82 year 2

76 year 3


Use of the initial assessment form and follow-up assessment form


Participant Exit Form

Timescale: Year 1 (August 2016-March 2017 – 5 months delivery)

Year 2 (April 2017-March 2018 – 12 months delivery)

Year 3 (April 2018- September 2018 – 6 months delivery)
















Evaluation plans

In order to steer the project evaluation, the project partners will form an Evaluation Management Group that will meet quarterly. The role of this group will be to:



External Evaluation

As mentioned above, the Evaluation Management Group will commission an external evaluation. This piece of work will embed the following:

The evaluation will be put out to tender. Potential providers of this work are as follows:

Jim Simpson Consultancy – [email protected]

Yvonne Rivers – [email protected]

Kat Pearce – [email protected]

Elaine Colomberg – [email protected]

Rona Parsons – [email protected]



Systems and Procedures


Arrangements to ensure that the project is managed effectively

Community Works as the lead partner will do the following to ensure that the project is managed effectively:


COMMUNITY ORGANISATION AND SCHOOL PARTNERSHIPS SCHOOL FACT SHEET
COMMUNITY SUPPORT TEAM REFERRAL FORM FOR
DELIVERING COMMUNITY SERVICES IN PARTNERSHIP GRANT AGREEMENT


Tags: better opportunities, building better, works, monitoring, community, project, better, building, opportunities, evaluation