SUMMARY OF THE FOURTH WORKSHOP OF METHANE WORKING GROUP

EMA520992013 EMAPDCO SUMMARY REPORT ON AN APPLICATION FOR A
!&()+0123456789?ABCDEFGHIJKLMWOPQRSTUVXYZ[]^ROOT ENTRY FNSUMMARYINFORMATION(DOCUMENTSUMMARYINFORMATION8WORDDOCUMENTS OH+0
UNISUM UNIVARIATE DATA SUMMARY MACRO

13 SUMMARY THIS AMENDMENT ENHANCES RECOMMENDATION Q7655
COOPERATIVE EDUCATION SUMMARY OF FORMS LOCATION STUDENT
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE SUMMARY OF ALL

Summary of the First Workshop of Methane Working Group of NCEAS‎

Summary of the Fourth Workshop of Methane Working Group

(Toward an adequate quantification of CH4 emissions from land ecosystems: Integrating field and in-situ observations, satellite data, and modeling)

March 19-20, 2009

National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis

Santa Barbara, CA




During the workshop (see the Appendix A for the agenda), we reported the progress on tasks planed in the last year’s workshop. Specifically (1) We have successfully organized a session, entitled “Methane: Toward Accurate Estimates of Fluxes Over Regional Scales”, organized and chaired by Christopher Butenhoff; Qianlai Zhuang; Ed Dlugokencky, and Xiaozhen Xiong, in American Geophysical Union (AGU) Fall Meeting. San Francisco, CA. More than 40 papers have contributed to the session. (2) 10 papers were published in a special section, entitled “Recent Field Observations and Modeling Studies on Methane" in the Journal of Geophysical Research - Biogeosciences. In addition, we have published a synthesis article in EOS and a book chapter on Arctic methane emissions in the United Nations Environmental Programme Yearbook. The paper titles and authors are listed in the Appendix B. (3) We have continually archived in situ measurement data of methane fluxes and auxiliary variables in NCEAS Data Repository website (http://data.nceas.ucsb.edu).


During the workshop, we spent most of our time to detail our planned four synthesis articles (See Appendix C). These synthesis papers are planned for submission to a special issue in Biogeochemistry or Journal of Geophysical Research – Biogeosciences. Qianlai Zhuang and John Melack are the contact persons for this special issue/ section. We anticipate the preliminary results for these papers will be ready by August 5th of 2009 and the results will be sufficient for putting together abstracts for the 2009 AGU Fall meeting. The complete draft of these papers will be ready by December 31, 2009. The final form of these papers will be submitted by the January 31, 2010 to the planned special issue / section.


We also decided to organize a session in the 2009 Fall AGU annual meeting. The session will focus on reporting these synthesis efforts and updating progresses on methane cycling studies. Butenhoff and Zhuang will lead this activity.











Appendix A.



Schedule for the Forth Workshop of Methane Working Group


(Toward an adequate quantification of CH4 emissions from land ecosystems: Integrating field and in-situ observations, satellite data, and modeling)


March 19-20, 2009


National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara, CA




March 19, 2009


8:45 a.m. Introduction and Workshop Goals (Qianlai)


9:00 a.m. Progress Report

  1. 2008 AGU methane session(Chris, Xiaozhen, Ed, and Qianlai)

  2. Data organization (Kim)

  3. Synthesis products (Qianlai)

1. EOS article

2. UNEP chapter

3. Special issue of JGR-B


9:30 a.m. Writing Team Grouping

1. Controls on methane emissions across different wetland types/ landscapes (Kim and Merritt et al.)

2. Global rice paddy emissions: A synthesis study (Aslam and Chris et al.)

3. Methane emissions dynamics with process-based and inverse models 2003 and 2004 in Amazon Basin (Qianlai and John et. al.)

4. Integration of Arctic emissions of permafrost land and lakes (Qianlai and Katey et al.)

5. Methane emissions and atmospheric concentrations in South Asia (Xiaozhen et al.)

6. Other new initiatives (e.g., Physics today article)


10:00 a.m. Snack and Coffee Break


10:20 a.m. Group Writing


12:00 - Lunch


1:30 p.m. Group Writing


3:00 p.m. Snack and Coffee Break


3.30 p.m. Group Writing

5:00 p.m. Adjourn


6:30 p.m. Group Dinner





March 20, 2009


8:45 a.m. Writing Group Report


9:00 a.m. Group Writing

10:30 a.m. Snack and Coffee Break

10:50 a.m. Group Writing

12:00 - Lunch


1:30 p.m. Group Writing


3:00 p.m. Snack and Coffee Break


3:30 p.m. Wrap-up

  1. Synthesis products and deliverables

  2. Data depository

  3. Final report of the project


4:30 p.m. Adjourn








Appendix B.


Publication associated with the Working Group


Gauci, Vincent; Blake, Stephen; Stevenson, David S.; Highwood, Eleanor J. 2008. Halving of the northern wetland CH4 source by a large Icelandic volcanic eruption. Journal of Geophysical Research. Vol: 113. Pages G00A11.


Gauci, Vincent; Dise, Nancy B.; Howell, Graham; Jenkins, Meaghan E. 2008. Suppression of rice methane emission by sulfate deposition in simulated acid rain. Journal of Geophysical Research. Vol: 113. Pages G00A07.


Khalil, M. Aslam K.; Butenhoff, Christopher. 2008. Spatial variability of methane emissions from rice fields and implications for experimental design. Journal of Geophysical Research. Vol: 113. Pages G00A09.


Khalil, M. Aslam K.; Shearer, M. J.; Changlin, Duan; Lixin, Ren. 2008. Production, oxidation, and emissions of methane from rice fields in China. Journal of Geophysical Research. Vol: 113. Pages G00A04.


Khalil, M. Aslam K.; Shearer, M. J.; Rasmussen, R. A.; Xu, Li; Liu, Jin-Luan. 2008. Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from subtropical rice agriculture in China. Journal of Geophysical Research. Vol: 113. Pages G00A05.


Turetsky, Merritt R.; Treat, C. C.; Waldrop, Mark P.; Waddington, J. M.; Harden, J. W.; McGuire, A. David. 2008. Short-term response of methane fluxes and methanogen activity to water table and soil warming manipulations in an Alaskan peatland. Journal of Geophysical Research. Vol: 113 . Pages G00A10.


Walter, Katey; Chanton, J. P.; Chapin, F. Stuart; Schuur, Edward A.G.; ,. 2008. Methane production and bubble emissions from arctic lakes: Isotopic implications for source pathways and ages. Journal of Geophysical Research. Vol: 113. Pages G00A08.


White, Jeffrey R.; Shannon, Robert D.; Weltzin, Jake F.; Pastor, John; Bridgham, Scott D. 2008. Effects of soil warming and drying on methane cycling in a northern peatland mesocosm study. Journal of Geophysical Research. Vol: 113. Pages G00A06.


Xiong , Xiaozhen; Barnet, Chris; Maddy, Eric; Sweeney, Colm; Liu, Xingpin; Zhou, Lihang; Goldberg, Mitch. 2008. Characterization and validation of methane products from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS). Journal of Geophysical Research. Vol: 113. Pages G00A01.


Zhuang, Qianlai; Melack, John M.; Zimov, Sergei; Walter, Katey; Butenhoff, Christopher; Khalil, M. Aslam K. 2009. Global methane emissions from wetlands, rice paddies, and lakes. EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union. Vol: 90(5). Pages 37-44.

Zhuang, Qianlai; Reeburgh, William S. 2008. Introduction to special section on synthesis of recent terrestrial methane emission studies. Journal of Geophysical Research. Vol: 113. Pages G00A02.


Melillo, Jerry M.; Hassol, S.; Archer, D.; Callaghan, T.; Chapin, F. Stuart; Christensen, T.; McGuire, A. David; Walter, Katey; Zhuang, Qianlai. 2008. Methane from the Arctic: Global warming wildcard. Chapter in United Nations Environmental Programme Yearbook. Pages 37-48.




Appendix C.


Outlines for the Proposed Special Section of Journal of Geophysical Research - Biogeosciences or Biogeochemistry



Article #1: Global methane emissions from inundated regions

Zhuang, Q., J. Melillo, R. Prinn, A. D. McGuire, and members of Working Group

  1. Introduction

  1. Current global estimates for different regions (e.g., Potter et al. for the U.S.)

  2. Synthesis goal of this Working Group

  3. What this series of studies have accomplished


  1. Results

  1. Surprising results

  2. Global view of methane emissions (one figure)

  3. Global quantification of emissions (one table)

  1. Discussion

  1. Data products

  2. Identify gaps in these areas (each group provides that information)



Article #2: Amazonian basin-wide methane emissions

Melack, J., P. Crill, S. Houweling, Q. Zhuang and others,


1. Introduction (J. Melack)

Spatial resolution:

River-basins (100m x 100m)

Grided (1o x 1o)

Temporal resolution:

Monthly

Interannual

Inundation (10km x 10km)

2. Method

Developing fluxes:

  1. Paint-by-numbers: Using 2 habitats data (e.g., Lehner and Doll, 2004) and Melack’s data; Using one set of fluxes for habitats to develop a table to include new / additional flux data

  2. MODIS or other satellite empirical approach (specific sites for developing empirical relationships); Using two habitats data to develop the estimates

  3. Process-based modeling:

Kaplan model (Melack)

Walter model (Melack)

TEM model (Zhuang, Melack)

  1. Upland emissions

Canopy emissions (Crill)

Biomass burning (Zhuang)

Satellite data comparison

(1) Feed fluxes to TM5 and then compare to SCIAMACHY data (Houweling, Melack)

(2) See if AIRS retrieval data can also contribute to study (Get Houweling’s opinion)


3. Results (Melack, Crill, Houweling, Zhuang)



4. Discussion (All)



Article #3: Synthesis of Rice Field Methane Emissions


Possible contributors: Aslam Khalil, Chris Butenhoff, Xiaozhen Xiong, Sander Houweling, Steve Frolking, Qianlai Zhang


1. Introduction


2. Processes and Models

2.1 DNDC

2.2 Yan (UNFCC) statistical

2.3 PSU – hybrid

2.4 TEM

2.5 TM5/Sciamachy Inversion


3. Description of underlying data sets

3.1. Inundation

3.2 N-Fertilizer

3.3 Organic C, green, animal, straw, roots

3.4 Crop phenology

3.5 Rice areas

3.6 Soil temperature

3.7 Soil type

Others?

4. Calculated inventories and comparisons

4.1 DNDC

4.2 Yan

4.3 PSU

4.4 TEM

4.5 TM5/Sciamachy Inversion – Can inversion be optimized for seasonality?


5. Validation

5.1 Run bottom-up inventories through TM5 (forward modeling)

5.2 Comparison of forward runs with AIRS

5.3 Comparison of forward runs with other data sets, ground-based?

6. Observations/Discussion and Conclusions

6.1 Our thinking of the state-of-knowledge

6.2 Caveats

6.3 Data made available by project/NCEAS archive

Article #4: Towards a reconciliation of methane emissions from northern high latitude ecosystems

(Dave, Aslam, Kim, Merritt, Katey, Sergei, Patrick, Qianlai, others?).


  1. Introduction (Dave)

Provide range of estimates from different perspectives: inversions, inventories,

process models.

Identify a couple of key issues – (1) the challenge of dividing “wetlands” into

classes that optimize partitioning of the variance in fluxes; and (2) constraining

the area of wetlands that need to be considered.


  1. Methods

Inversion analyses (Aslam)

Inventory analyses

Wetlands (Kim, Merritt)

Lakes (Katey, Sergei, Patrick, Kim, Qianlai)

Process-model analyses (Qianlai)


  1. Results


Inversion Analyses: north of about 45 degrees (split into 45 to 60 degrees and

north of 60 degrees?). (Aslam)


Inventory


Wetlands (Kim, Merritt): Estimates for different stratifications – only one type of

wetland, four types of wetlands (bogs, fens, fluvial, etc.) – and two different data

sets – Matthews and Global Wetland Product). Estimates could be based on

means from literature or from data base being assembled.


Lakes (Katey, Sergei, Patrick, and Kim): Estimates for different stratifications –

only one type of lake, several types of lakes (e.g., shallow/deep, fringed with

vegetation/not fringed with vegetation, permafrost/not permafrost, open/closed),

and possibly a geospatial approach (Qianlai).


Process Models (Qianlai) – Using Matthew and Fung’s global wetland data set.



  1. Discussion (All)


8



HEADLINE SUMMARY AND AGREED ACTION POINTS OF OLD
NAME DATE BURRITO SUMMARY TOPIC SENTENCE
ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGIC PLANNING SUMMARY THREE OPTIONS OPTION


Tags: fourth workshop, methane, fourth, working, workshop, group, summary